Political activist Yogendra Yadav on Tuesday brought two people to the Supreme Court who were declared dead in a special intensive revision (Sir) of the electoral role in Bihar tied to the vote.
Yadav, who personally addressed the bench of judges Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, said the names of these two people would not appear in election roles because they were declared dead.
Also read | Bihar Sir seems to be problems with the deficit of trust: SC
“See them, please. They are declared dead. They don’t appear. But they are alive … See them,” Yadav said during hearing about a dose of petitions that question Bihar Sir, reported the statutory news website and bench.
Yadav is one of the petitioners in this case.
Senior defending champion Rrakesh Dwivedi, who appeared for the Indian Election Commission, described the subordinates as “drama”. Justice Bagchi said it could have been an unintentional mistake.
“Maybe it was an unintentional mistake. You can fix. But your points are well received,” the judge said. However, Yadav said that Sir, according to the proposal, led to mass exclusion.
“Extensive exclusion has already begun … Exclusion is much more than 65 lakhs. It is not a failure of Sir implementation, but because of the fact that where you implement sir, the result will be the same,” Yadav said.
Yadav also said that people were never asked to submit their forms to reviewing in the country’s history.
“If this happened in 2003, the other party should point out,” he said, adding that Sir did not lead to any additions. He claimed it was an exercise in intensive erase.
“In 2003, it was strange that Sir did, besides being used by the word“ intense ”. This is the first exercise in the history of the country where there was a revision with zero accessories. Zero accessories. ”
Also read | SC twisted on the remaining food waste to discourage stray dogs from the courts
Yadav called the whole process “terrible” and said that Sir was the biggest exercise of negotiations.
“We also confirm that women deleted more than men. 31 women of the Lakh have been erased … 25 men were deleted,” he added. Yadav also pointed to two people in the courtroom who were allegedly declared dead by the election authorities.
“The character is obliged to exceed 1 crore. This is not a problem of revision. See them
“Mostly a problem with the deficit of trust”
During the hearing, the Supreme Court called a series of special intensive revisions (SIR) in a Bihar survey “predominantly a problem with confidence deficit” because the Election Commission (ECI) claimed that about 6.5 people of the total of 7.9 voting populations did not have to file any documents or their parents in the 2003 military war.
During the hearing, the bench of judges Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi noted that “it seems to be largely a case of confidence deficit, nothing else” because it has questioned the petitioners who question the decision of the election commission on June on June.
Also read Prashant Bhushan holds Arvind Kejriwal responsible for debacle AAP Delhi Poll
“If of 7.9 Crore voters, 7.24 crore voters answered Lord, Demolistesthe theory of one Crore voter who was missing or released,” said the bench manager of Kapil Sibal, who appeared for the petitioners and RJD Member Manoi Jha.
These are declared dead. They don’t look. But they’re alive … see them.
Siber said during hearing that while in one election district, unlike the poll demands, 12 people were declared dead alive, in another case the living persons were declared dead.
At the end of today’s hearing, Kant thanked Yadav for his help and “analysis”. Hearing will continue on Wednesday.
(With Livelaw, Bar and Benches inputs)
(Tagstotranslate) Bihar elections
