Three Bombay High Court judges reportedly recited from hearing the CEO of HDFC Bank and MD Sashidhar Jagdishan to abolish the company registered against him for a complaint filed by Lilavi Kirtal Mehta Medical Trust.
If messages are to be believed, it is unlikely to be six other judges.
The sources told the live law that Jagdišan’s legal team gave the main judge of India (CJI) a list of six judges, which approved him that these judges did not hear this matter because they have already been heard from hearing cases concerning Lilavati Hospital.
Why did the 3 Bombay HC the judges surrendered again hearing the case?
While some judges quoted that they had cooperated with the confidence or lawyers who appeared for him, one judge voluntarily revealed on Thursday that he had held several shares of HDFC Bank.
According to Bar and Bench, the case was first mentioned on June 18 before the bench of judges such as Gadkari and Rajesh Patil. Judge Pedil Recursed, then the matter was stated in front of the bench led by Judge Sarang Kotwal. This bench also returned.
Subsequently, the matter was listed in front of the Justices MS Sonak and Jitendra Jain on Thursday.
However, JAIN JAIN revealed that he was holding shares at HDFC Bank. After the objection from the lawyer for Prashant Mehta, the legitimate representative of the trust, Judge Jain also re -abandoned this matter.
In accordance with this, the bench of the judges Mrs Sonak and Jitendra Jain reappeared and said that the matter would be placed in front of another bench.
What happens next
The thing will now have to be placed in front of the next bench.
This matter is likely to be mentioned in front of the divisional bench of Justices Ravindra Ghuge and Milind Sathay on Monday, June 30, because it is a designated alternative court, now left to heard the action under the list, reported the living law.
What’s that?
Lilavati Kirtal Mehta Medical Trust filed companies and accused the CEO of HDFC Bank and MD Sashidhar Jagdisdishan of Accept Right £2.05 Crore from the former Chetan Mehta administrator for giving him financial advice and helping him keep control over the administration of trust.
He also accused Jagdishan of interfering with his internal affairs by exploiting his position HDFC Bank’s head.
The complainant’s Trust runs the famous Lilavati Hospital in Mumbai.
Jagdišán was booked on the basis of accusations of cheating and a criminal violation of trust by a civil servant.
Confidence also filed a petition before the High Court to seek a probe of the Central Investigation Office (CBI) into this matter.
Companies against Jagdishan were registered at the Bandra Police Station after the Bandra Municipal Court’s order, according to Section 175 (3) Bharatiya Nagarik Surraksha Sanhit (BNSS).
Jagdišan later filed a lawsuit to annul this fir.
(With the entry from agencies)
(Tagstotranslate) HDFC Bank (T) Sashidhar Jagdishan (T) Bombay High Court (T) Fir (T) Lilavati Hospital
