The Supreme Court Collegium on Monday recommended the center of the name of the chief judge Bombay High Court Aradhe and the Chief Judge Patny High Court Vipul Manubhai Pancholi for promotion to the Supreme Court-the President of the Murmu-only has now been criticized.
“When exercising the powers awarded by the Indian Constitution, the President is pleased to appoint Aradhe, Chief Judge, Bombay High Court and (II) Shri Justice Vipul Manubhai Pancholi Meghwal.
In August 2021, the Supreme Court Collegium made a historical step by recommending three female judgments – justices BV Nagarathna, Him Kohl and Bela M TRIVEDI – for promotion to the Supreme Court. Since then, no judge of women has been promoted to the High Court on the basis of subsequent main judges.
Justice Nagarathna disagrees
The college includes the main judge Bravai, Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, JK Maleshwari and Nagarathn. Currently, the judiciary of BV Nagarathn remains the only female judge of the Supreme Court.
Some reports have now emerged that Judge BV Nagarathna has registered a strong disagreement with the recommendations of the Supreme Court of Collegia to promote Judge Vipul Manubhai Pancholi to the top and said it would be “counterproductive” to the judiciary.
According to a Message in Bar & BenchThere are three female judges who are superior to justice Pancholi.
The names that come – as seniors Judge Pancholi – include the chief judge of the Gujarate High Court, Sunita Agarwal, Judge Revati Prashant Mohite, appointed by the judge of the High Court in Mumbai and Judge Lisa Gill, appointed by Judge Punjab and Haryan High Court.
Justice Vipul Pancholi Was APPOINDED AS A JUDGE OF THE GUJARAT HIGH Court on October 1, 2014. Chief justice sunita agarwal of the gujarat High Court Was APPOINTED ON NOVEMBER 21, 2011 21, 2013, and justice Lisa Gill of the Punjab and Haryana High Court on March 31, 2014 – All of Whom Precede Pancholi in the Seniority.
The PTI news agency also quoted sources that are developing, claiming that Nagarathn’s judiciary noted in her disagreement that pushing forward with the appointment of justice Pancholi could disrupt “whether the credibility that the colleague still holds”.
Also read | The Supreme Court forms a session on a probe of rescue center Vantara Wildlife Rescue Center
The objections of the justice of Nagarathna partly stems from the transfer of justice Pancholi of July 2023 from the High Court in Gujarat to the High Court in Patno. According to reports, they will learn that it has been said that this is not a “routine transfer, but a carefully considered step taken after consultations with several higher judges, all of whom agreed with the decision”.
The Cjar statement is issued
The campaign of NGOs for judicial liability and reform (CJAR) also responded to disagreement with Judge Nagarathny to the promotion of justice Pancholi to the Supreme Court and stated that it is “also 57.
“It is not clear what the Supreme Court has influenced in the recommendation of Judge Pancholi to the Supreme Court, because Judge Pancholi is not just the third judge of Gujarat to be promoted to the Supreme Court (he has unduly stated that he is listed on the basis of the Supreme Court.”
(Tagstotranslate) Supreme Court
