Madurai Adheenam Harihara Gnanasambanda Design. File | Photo Credit: G. Moorthy
The wing of the Cyber Crime of the Greater Chennai Municipal Police turned to the Madras High Court with a reason for abolishing the predictive deposit granted by the main district of Chennai and the court for Madurai adheenam Harihara Gnanasand Designer Communication enmita and Muslims.
The origin of the bail was mentioned before the judge M. Nirmal Kumar on Wednesday (23 July 2025), but could not be accepted due to hearing due to lack of time. In the honorary statement filed in support of the action, the Police Inspector B. Padmakumari stated that the Pope had not ended with the investigation and therefore the foreshadowing deposit must be canceled by the court.
The inspector said the Pope had traveled from Madurai to Chennai on May 2. Then his car met a minor accident in the ulundurpet in the Kallakurichi district. But he made a public statement and gave an interview to the media, which indicated as if an attempt to murder and that attackers were Muslims.
In order to avoid municipal tensions due to its statements, the police immediately provided the CCTV shots from the ulundurpet and clearly showed that it was a simple traffic accident due to the speed of the Pope on the road. Subsequently, the wing of cyber crime reserved the first information report (companies) against Adheenam on the basis of a complaint filed by lawyer R. Rajenrin.
The company was registered according to sections 192 (inadvertently giving provocation with the intention of causing riots), 196 (1) (1) (a) (support for hostility between different groups due to religion), 353 para. (B) (statement of public misfortune) and false statements in the order) (Bharati (Bhaayaa) (Bhaaya) (Bhaayaa) (Brno) (Bhaayaa) (Bhaayaaa) (Bhaayaa) (Bhaayaa) (Bhaaya) (Bhaaya. 24 June.
Subsequently, the police convened the Pope on question 30 June. He sought for 20 days with citing his age and poor health. Then the police summoned him again on July 5. This time he was looking for permission to discover via a video call. However, his request has been rejected since Bharatiya Nagarik Surraksha Sanhit (BNSS) has not allowed such a facility to police investigations.
July 17, the court granted Adheenam Adheenam to us that he was convinced with his council Ramaswama Meyyappan that his client did not intend to incite municipal tensions and only responded to the questions asked by the media. “The questions were led and equal to inserting words into the petitioner’s mouth,” Sessions said.
Furthermore, given the fact that the Pope was 67 years old and that BNSS sets an exploration of individuals over 60 years in their place of residence, the court ordered Chennai Cyber Crime Sleuths to investigate in Adheenam’s place. In accordance with the police on June 20, she visited Adheenam on South Avani Street in Madurai.
Mrs. Padmakumari claimed that many people gathered on the premises and prevented the police from fulfilling their duty, saying: “The above circumstances show that the opponent/accused is not willing to cooperate with the investigation and constantly use one or other evasive tactics.
The inspector continued in the state: “Given these accompanying circumstances and the behavior of the opponent/accused, this case deserves the immediate cancellation of the preliminary deposit because the above fact shows a clear abuse of freedom granted to the opponents/accused and represents a serious threat to justice administration.”
Published – 23 July 2025 06:27
