US Supreme Court rulings on birthrights, transgender athletes’ rights and campaign finance today | Today’s news
The US Supreme Court is set to hand down the final four decisions of its 2025-26 term on Tuesday (June 30), with rulings expected in some of the nation’s most politically charged legal battles.
The pending cases involve President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship, state bans on transgender athletes competing in girls’ sports, campaign finance rules ahead of the 2026 election and parental rights in cases involving transgender minors.
Here’s a look at four major cases.
1. Birthright Citizenship: Can Trump Redefine Who Is a US Citizen?
Quick answers to key questions
•5 QUESTIONS
The plaintiffs argue that Trump’s executive order illegally strips US-born children of citizenship and access to benefits, violating the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause.
States such as Idaho and West Virginia adopt these laws based on the belief that they should protect the integrity of women’s sports and maintain fairness in competitive events.
If the Supreme Court strikes down the current federal limits on coordinated campaign spending, political parties could significantly increase financial support for their candidates, affecting the dynamics of elections.
The Supreme Court case will determine whether parents can challenge laws that allow shelters to withhold information from them about gender-affirming treatment of their children.
The decision could shape national policies on transgender rights and justice in sports and highlight the ongoing debate over states’ rights versus federal oversight.
The most closely watched case challenges an executive order by President Donald Trump that seeks to end automatic U.S. citizenship for children born to undocumented immigrants and some temporary visa holders.
Trump claims that the current interpretation of birthright citizenship encourages illegal immigration and so-called “birth tourism.”
The order is challenged by three foreign nationals who claim it violates the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause, which states:
“All persons born or naturalized in and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are citizens of the United States.”
The plaintiffs say the order illegally deprives their U.S.-born children of citizenship and access to benefits such as Social Security, Medicaid and government assistance.
2. Transgender athletes: Can states ban trans girls from girls’ sports?
The Supreme Court is also expected to rule on challenges to laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prevent transgender girls from participating on female school sports teams.
Idaho’s law applies to public schools and colleges, while West Virginia’s law requires transgender girls to compete on boys’ or co-ed teams.
About half of the US states have implemented similar restrictions.
During oral arguments, several conservative justices suggested that states should have the power to set their own rules rather than a court-imposed statewide constitutional standard.
The rulings are expected to be a landmark in the national debate about transgender rights and women’s sports.
3. Campaign finance: Could parties spend more to help candidates?
Another big case involves federal limits on coordinated campaign spending between political parties and individual candidates.
Current law limits how much official party committees — including the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Democratic National Committee (DNC) — can spend in coordination with candidates.
Republican groups argue that the restrictions violate First Amendment free speech protections.
If the Supreme Court strikes down the limits, national party organizations could spend significantly more money directly supporting candidates ahead of the 2026 election.
The decision could reshape campaign fundraising and political advertising in future federal elections.
4. Rights of parents and transgender minors
A fourth case examines whether parents can challenge Washington state laws protecting runaway transgender minors seeking gender-affirming care.
The parents argue that the laws allow shelters to withhold information from families when minors seek gender-affirming treatment or reproductive health care.
Washington says shelters can delay notifying parents if staff believe disclosure could expose children to abuse or neglect.
The Supreme Court has not yet ruled on whether the laws themselves are constitutional.
Instead, they will determine whether the parents have legal standing to file suit after lower courts have ruled that they have not shown sufficient harm.
The case is the first before the Supreme Court to deal directly with the rights of parents in relation to the transition of a child’s gender identity.
Read also | Trump loses Supreme Court appeal in E. Jean Carroll case; The $5 million verdict stands
Why judgments matter
These four decisions are expected to have far-reaching consequences in several areas:
Immigration: The birthright citizenship order could redefine who automatically becomes a US citizen at birth.
Transgender rights: Sports and parental rights cases could shape national policy on transgender participation and health care for minors.
Election: Campaign finance decisions could change how political parties finance candidates ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Federal versus state authority: Several cases test the balance between constitutional protections and the power of states to make their own laws.
With these rulings, the Supreme Court will conclude its 2025-26 term, making decisions that will likely affect American politics, elections and constitutional law beyond this year.
Read also | US Supreme Court Upholds Mail-In Ballots Received After Election Day
