Hyderabad
Report on the Inquiry Commission with the PC Ghose Commission Commission with Kaleshwaam Project-Medigadda, Annaram and Refunded that it was the only decision of the then Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhara Rao, from the project conceptualization, as part of the She was interested in three Barrages.
In its 665 -page report, which was submitted and discussed on Sunday in the Assembly, the Commission stated that all decisions on three barriers were taken by the then main minister from the State Formation (2. The report stated that the administrative approval for these three barriers was awarded on 1 March 2016 and the agreements were concluded with the contracting agencies in July in August this year without obtaining the necessary permits from the Central Water Commission or even applied for the Kaleshwaam project. The DPR was presented CWC in February 2017.
Due to the then government to change the location of the main thumb from Tummidihatti to Medigadd, the Ghos Panel report reports that literally observation of CWC on hydrology for pranahita-cheevel 4. Also for Barrage in Medigadda, “the commission said.
In November 2017, he quoted a letter addressed by CWC by the main engineer Kaleshwaam, with a reason to explore costs at 7,38,851 hectares of new Ayacut and stabilization of existing 7 62 028 ha.
The then government admitted revised administrative approval in 2018 and 2022, while from October 2017 to June 2018, permission/approval from 11 directors, councils and ministry were obtained. The report pointed out that the time was extended six times with respect to Medigadd, 5 times for Annaram and 8 times for their construction for their construction, when contracting agencies wrote to the government and blamed delays in the passing of places and facilities and drawings for delay in construction work.
The Commission categorically concluded that these three fires were built as reservoirs/dams under the veil and in the name of the barik, although Wapcos, who prepared the DPR, noted that the places were permeable in nature and witnesses before the committee, including experts that believe that they can only be built on such land and non -reservoirs or dams.
The Commission report further stated that the Central Designs Organization (CDO) was unable to propose barriers as dams/reservoirs, although it has realized the fact that they will be used as dams and “this basic and basic defect in designing three barriers is also the main cause of structures”.
“From the conception of barriers and anxiety caused by them in 2023, there was an uncontrollable and insolent procedure and financial inconsistencies in planning, bidding, construction, operation and maintenance of three barilats,” said the report.
Read more
Published – 1 September 2025 20:00 is
