Scientists questioned the intention of the South Africa with a bat after the World Cup final against Australia in Lord’s wasted an advantage. Former Australia opener Matthew Hayden was critical of the Towards of Bavum after South Africa on Wednesday in London in London fell to 43 at 43 on 43 on the stump, with Australia on the day of the day.
South Africa took 22 overs to reach 43 in the final meeting during which The Australian Pacers, led by Mitchell Starc, dominated the proceedings. The Starc claimed two goals, while Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood joined one by one after a piece to dismantle the highest order of South Africa.
Kagiso Rabada previously put South Africa in a strong position with five goals, but the dough could not earn and take home the advantage.
When Hayden talked to Jiohostar after the dramatic day of the start of 14 goals in Lord’s, he blamed Bavum for lack of intent after protease early failures.
Bavuma remained undefeated for 3 out of 37 balls, but South Africa tried to score freely at the evening meeting.
“Who would think there would be nine goalies in the final meeting? It’s almost away against the grain. As you can see, it’s an absolutely beautiful day. In fact, it was completely covered with a cloud half a day and the other half was polar opposite – clean and sunny,” Hayden said.
David Bedingham, who came in No. 6, hit two boundaries in the finals and stayed at 8.
Lack of intention: Hayden
South Africa lost the opener Aiden Markram in the first through their shifts. Ryan Rickelton, who showed the early intention, was released in ninth place.
During the 1st day there was a demanding tab. While the Australian Supreme Order was dismantled under the overcast sky, the ball continued to move after the sun appeared in the afternoon.
South African Africa No. 3, Wiaan Mulder, showed a small intention to turn a strike or exert pressure and record only 6 out of 44 supplies before cummins bowed to the beauty to knock on its stumps. Hazlewood was then removed by Tristan Stubbs (2), giving Australia the upper hand at the end.
“You would think that batting conditions would improve how the conditions of overhead conditions have been cleaned, but it certainly wasn’t. And I suppose the only reason I would say that Australia could be enclosed – maybe 80% call – is due to lack of the intention of the South African Batting Unit.”
“When you think about his captain’s performance, it is not just a placement in the field or bowling changes-it is also about leading the queue as a captain of the launch, showing vigor and intention. Of course, you are against the three world quick pitchmakers in conditions that suit them, but what Australia would enjoy in this South African.”
Dale Steyn agrees
Meanwhile, the former South Africa of Rast Bowler Dalen agreed with Hayden and claimed that the dough lacked proactivity, allowing the Australian dark trio – Cummins, Starc and Hazlewood – on the bowl without any real pressure.
“Yeah, absolutely. I think you are looking at standout artists – Steve Smith – and he always looked at the score. The commentators said it, and I listened carefully: to defend straight and score the square.
“But if you are just standing there, you allow the world’s best mounting boots to dictate conditions. They mix the ball exactly where they want, and nine times out of ten, get you out. So South Africa has to find a way – that is, they descend a little, deepen a little or move laterally – or move laterally.”
After the first session, Australia was at 67 years old, but Steve Smith and Beau Webster saved the champion defending champions 79-running partnership for the fifth goal.
Smith took on a South African attack and hit 10 borders in his 112-Míček 66, while Webster added a smooth 72 out of 92 balls, 11 of them four. However, the last five goals in Australia have dropped to only 30 runs.
Smith emulation was not easy: Bangar
However, the former India Sanjay Bangar coach offered South African dough another perspective. He claimed that the attack on the pressure from pressure was not possible due to the conditions and quality of the opposition.
He also pointed out that he is unrealistic to expect South Africa mimics Smith and quotes significant differences in class.
“When we talk about Steve Smith – and it goes to your question – how do the South Africans replicate this kind of tabs? The gates scoring square is easy to design, but when you take into account the playground and conditions, it’s not that simple.
“There is a significant gap in the skills sets, and one has to recognize it. We are talking about a batsman who scored more than 10,000 test runs – someone who can smoothly adapt to changing the conditions and location in the field.
“If South Africa is to try something else, I would propose to accept slightly more positive thinking. If you do it, your work on your feet will become more useful, get better and have more control over your shots.
“But yes, Steven Smith is another caliber Batsman – really a class apart.
The famous Trio Pacers Australia did not give anything in the final meeting and used the movement that the Lord’s playground offered. The Duke ball moved even after she lost her paint, which made the life of the dough more difficult.
Published:
Rishabh beniwal
Published on:
June 12, 2025
