When cricket’s biggest and most lucrative game slips out of hand, the instinctive reaction for most would be to prepare for the impact and consequences. But in a decision that overturned that expectation, Bangladesh is being rewarded, not punished, for missing out on the Men’s T20 World Cup in 2026. Contrary to what was expected to be a disciplinary move, the ICC has applied what could be called cricket realpolitik in overcoming the crisis surrounding the 2026 Men’s T20 World Cup.
In the eye of the storm was the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB). It has refused to send its national team to India for scheduled matches in the T20 World Cup, citing security concerns. Rather than face fines or sanctions, BCB have now exited the tournament with guarantees of future hosting rights and no recorded penalties.
The International Cricket Council’s (ICC) response, which can be seen as supportive rather than punitive, is certainly contradictory, if not alarming. Here we tell you why Bangladesh were rewarded, not punished, for missing the T20 World Cup in India.
ICC SAYS NO SANCTIONS ON BANGLADESH. DHAKA ALSO PROMISED ICC ACTION BEFORE 2031
Despite pulling out of the T20 World Cup, Bangladesh will not face any financial, sporting or administrative sanctions from the ICC, the global governing body has confirmed after intense discussions involving the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and the BCB itself.
An official ICC press release said its decision was guided by “principles of neutrality and fairness” and reflected the goal of “facilitating support rather than punishment”.
Importantly, the BCB also retains the right to refer to the ICC Dispute Resolution Committee under existing regulations, a right expressly reserved by the Board.
Not only has Bangladesh been cleared of all punitive measures, it has also been promised the rights to host the ICC’s next global event ahead of the 2031 Men’s Cricket World Cup, which it is already set to co-host with India.
This hosting assurance is subject to the ICC’s usual selection and planning processes, but symbolically signals the council’s long-term goodwill. The decision, the ICC explained, highlights that Bangladesh remains a “priority cricket ecosystem” with continued investment potential and a key role in the global growth of the sport, according to a statement from the cricket body.
BCB president Aminul Islam Bulbul welcomed the result and acknowledged the continued collaboration between the board and global cricket bodies. Pakistan’s “support” for Bangladesh during the discussions it merely followed Dhaka’s persuasion and got Islamabad to play the February 15 game against India, which it had previously boycotted.
But, as many assumed, Pakistan will now play the game and the financial weight of the game has played its rightful role.
A BIT OF BACKGROUND ON THE PCB-BCB-ICC STANDOFF AND THE LAHORE MEETING
The controversy began in early January when the BCB formally informed the ICC that it would not travel to India for the T20 World Cup group matches due to security concerns. The move followed the release of Bangladeshi pacer Mustafizur Rahman from IPL franchise KKR. backlash raised by a former BJP MLA from Uttar Pradesh.
The ICC rejected Bangladesh’s request to relocate their matches to Sri Lanka and insisted on the original plan. As a result, Scotland were drafted in to replace Bangladesh in the T20 World Cup. This set off a potential chain reaction in international cricket. Pakistan initially announced a boycott of its own match against India in solidarity with Bangladesh. Islamabad’s decision jeopardized the February 15 showdown between India and Pakistan in Colombo, which will generate billions in broadcast revenue.
Amid escalating tensions, a crucial meeting between the ICC and the PCB was held in Lahore. BCB President Bulbul had to rush to the meeting which was primarily convened to examine Pakistan’s participation in the match against India in Colombo.
The negotiations took place in a “constructive and friendly” atmosphere, ICC officials said. During and after the meeting, reports suggested that the PCB might do a U-turn and agree to play against India. This threw the ball in the court of the civilian government of Pakistan. On Monday evening, the Prime Minister of Pakistan Shehbaz Sharif gave green light to PCB travel to Colombo to play against India on February 15.
SO WHY DID BANGLADESH NOT PUNISH THE ICC FOR SKIPPING THE T20 WORLD CUP?
The final communique reaffirmed no sanctions against Bangladesh. BCB’s rights to seek formal dispute resolution and the understanding that Bangladesh would host a future ICC event were also preserved.
This conciliatory tone was not accidental.
ICC Director General Sanjog Gupta called the episode “regrettable”. He said it will not harm Bangladesh’s long-term standing in world cricket. It was stressed that short-term interruptions should not define the role of a full member on the global stage, even though he pulled out of the 2026 Men’s World T20 Cup at the last minute.
What the ICC says about fairness, respect for the full member and long-term commitment is only one layer of the story. Meeting in Lahore on SundayAlso important is BCB chief Aminul Islam Bulbul around 1:00 am from Dhaka. This meeting should be understood not just as a mediation but as a hard negotiation shaped by the role of Pakistan and the pressure of the ICC.
Encouraged by Pakistan’s early support and its threat to withdraw from the match against India, Bangladesh took a step and withdrew from the World Cup.
Pakistan’s call for a boycott was never about Bangladesh itself. It was a pressure tactic. But as predicted by several observers, including Sunil Gavaskar, Pakistan’s stance was always reversible. When the turning point came, Islamabad not only didn’t come back into India’s game, but also brought Bangladesh to the table.
For the ICC, the India vs Pakistan match was non-negotiable. This single match generates more revenue than several other World Cup matches combined and its cancellation would shake the tournament’s ledgers. In addition to its own balance sheet, the ICC also had to look after smaller governing boards such as the PCB and BCB, whose survival depended on central board funding.
Reading this leverage correctly and initially supported by Pakistan, Bangladesh seized the moment to turn the tide in their favour. By the time the dust had settled in Lahore, the ICC had protected their marquee match, Pakistan had staged a turnaround and Bangladesh had turned their absence into future guarantees without a single sanction.
WHAT IF BANGLADESH WAS PUNISHED FOR SKIPPING THE WORLD CUP?
If the ICC had taken the punitive route on BCB, the consequences could have been far-reaching. Financial sanctions or bans could have damaged BCB’s fragile balance sheet, exacerbated fan disillusionment and soured diplomatic relations.
Bangladesh is one of the largest cricket markets in the world with a passionate fan base exceeding 200 million. It is a commercial asset that the ICC cannot afford to alienate. Sports sanctions could also damage player morale and development pathways for budding cricketers in Bangladesh.
Money earned from ICC events is centralized and then redistributed, which is how boards like the BCB stay financially afloat, run domestic structures and meet player payment obligations. If the ICC’s revenue stream is affected, the failure is not limited to the board. Most cricket boards (except the big four: India, England, Australia and New Zealand) feel it the hardest.
After Bangladesh decided not to participate in the World Cup, a report by news agency PTI said that BCB stood to lose around BDT 325 million (about $27 million or Rs 247 million), which comes from the ICC’s annual revenue. In addition, the loss of broadcasting and sponsorship income would follow. Overall, BCB’s revenue for the 2025-26 financial year could fall by 60% or more.
Former Bangladesh captain Tamim Iqbal then urged the BCB to avoid “public emotions” in deciding Bangladesh’s participation in the T20 World Cup. He said such a move would have “an impact 10 years from now”.
With Bangladesh already staring at losses running into crores for missing the tournament in India, any further punitive action by the ICC would worsen the blow for BCB. From this perspective, the concessions made to Bangladesh are as much about justice as they are about preemptive mitigation and remediation of the financial impact of his absence. Bangladesh eventually received rewards, not punishments, despite missing out on the ICC T20 World Cup tournament.
T20 World Cup | T20 World Cup Schedule | T20 World Cup Points Table | T20 World Cup Videos | Cricket News | Live Score
– The end
Issued by:
Sushim Mukul
Published on:
February 10, 2026