West Indies complained about DRS mistakes by the third referee Adrian Holdstock during their first test against Australia. (AP) Cricket coach West Indies Daren Sammy raised concern about Adrian Holdstock’s decision -making Adrian Holdstock during the opening test against Australia in Barbados after several controversial reviews on the second day of the game. Sammy met Javagal Srinath on Thursday to discuss his concerns that stems from the previous Holdstock Office in the ODI series in England.Two key decisions were particularly concerned about the Western India team. The first included the release of LBW Captain Roston Chase of Bowling Pat Cummins, despite what the team believed that he showed evidence of the inner edge. The second concerned Shai Hope’s, who caught the release of Beau Webster, where he was clean after review.Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe!“We’re just trying to find some understanding of what this process is,” Sammy said. “We only hope in the consistency. That’s all we could ask. When there is doubt in something, be consistent across the album.”“I noticed, especially with this particular judge, it is something that started for me in England. It’s frustrating. I’m just asking for consistency in decision -making.”Sammy specifically dealt with his fears from the Holdstock Office. “Yeah, look, don’t you want to get in a situation where you are interested in certain judges. Is there anything against this team?“So I want to have the conversation about the process … So we could all be clear. Because at the end of the day you don’t want to go into a test match that doesn’t trust the judges. And that’s not what our team is about. So we’re just looking for some clarity about the decision.”When Sammy asked for a formal complaint, she remained uncommon and said, “You will have to wait and see it.”
User X at the Office in West India vs. Australia first test.
As for Chase’s release, which occurred during the decisive 67-run partnership of the sixth goal with hope, Sammy noted: “In our opinion, we saw the ball deviated on the mat.”Sammy has established a comparison between the release of Hope and Travis Head from the previous day. “I’m just saying, the judge, what you see,” Sammy said. “If you see the same thing and one is not out there, there is even more doubt about the other than you give it. I don’t know what to see again, but from the pictures we have seen, the decision is not fair enough for both teams.Australia also experienced a controversial decision when their morning appeal against Chase was rejected. Mitchell Starc questioned synchronization between images and sound in repetitions.“There were some interesting,” Starc said. “It is obvious that several others went against West India than us. One for us (against Chase) seemed to be a gap between the bat and the ball, it cost us 40 odd runs, but then controversial to get the goal.”“As players, you can only ask. We don’t use this technology to make this decision.
User X at the Office in West India vs. Australia first test.
User X at the Office in West India vs. Australia first test.
The Starc mentioned that the Australian team believed that the head was hope to be excluded the previous day.Sammy acknowledged the risks of commenting on the match officials and discouraged their players from the discussion on decisions. “We know the rules. We know that the fines are running throughout the album,” he said. “I don’t want them to focus on it. Yes, we’re shooting a little in our feet by dropping so many catches, but look at the test match, (us) against our own self, some of these decisions and we are still in position.”
