WAQF Act Row: The Council for Personal Legal Rights of the whole India (Aimplb) accused the Prime Minister of Narendra modi-governed by the Government by the Trade Union to submit incorrect data at the Supreme Court in the ongoing case against the WAQF law.
The apex organ of the Muslim clergy in India was looking for an action against the officer concerned in the Ministry of the Union for the submission of what he calls “false affidavit”.
Also read | Why Waqf Bill needs an amendment: Key with you from Fire in Kiren Rijiju
The Board of Directors has objections to the Center statement that the number of WAQF features recorded to the central portal after 2013 has “shocked by 116 %”, PTI said.
“A bad false narrative”
“In his affidavit statement, the Indian probe suggests that all real estate registered as WAQF before 2013 were immediately recorded on the Wamsi portal when it became functional. On page 158, the first column called” Number of real estate in 2013 “said that the number of WAQF was only registered.” He realized that he realized that he realized that he realized that he realized that he realized that he realized that he realized that he realized the court that had loans. Talha Abdul Rahman before the decisive hearing in the case of planned on May 5.
The Center filed a preliminary declaration on the Supreme Court on the interim Act on a preliminary statement of 1,332 pages that sought to release petitions that question the constitutional validity of the WAQF Act (amendment).
The Government demanded a “shocking increase” by 116 % in the number of WAQF real estate in the country since 2013. It also opposed the arguments of the necessary registration “WAQF by the user” by April 8, if the provision is affected by the Provisional Order “.
Also read | Nothing arbitrary if the government appoints a non -Muslimy on WAQF: GOVT
SC 17 April awarded the Center a weekly time to give a response to petitions that question the constitutional validity of the controversial law.
“The department against the counter -affidavit was not honest with this court, and it seems that he carefully avoided the statement that” all WAQF’s registered features were recorded on the web portal in 2013 “. Since this fundamental aspect is missing in Afridavit in Afridation in Afridation for the first time and is missing. ”
The Board of Directors said that the department (the official who filed an affidavit) must file an affidavit and state that the number of real estate reflected on the Wamsi) contained all registered WAQFS as in 2013.
“The claim that the” shocking “increase in the number of WAQF real estate since 2013 has been a claim that is not supported and equal to the harsh accusation in the plea. This HON’BLE court has the power to strike such pleas, ”the council said.
He assured the court that until then WAQF, including the Waqf-By-Uer user, nor its character.
The concept of “waqf-by-user” concerns the practice where the property is recognized as WAQF on the basis of its long-term, continuous use for such purposes, even if there is no formal registration.
Also read | Muslims under the attack for 11 years: Assaduddin Owaisi On Waqf Law
The Supreme Court resolved further hearing in the case of a week that launched on May 5, when the responses of the Center, States and the petitioners against the law will be submitted.
Law Waqf (Aneledment), 2025, This came into force at the beginning of this month, was asked by a dose of petition. Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha approved the bill during the recently closed budget meeting of parliament.
President of the Murm She gave her consent to the proposed Act 5 April.
The claim that the “shocking” increase in the number of WAQF real estate since 2013 has been not supported and is not supported and equal to the harsh accusation.
(Tagstotranslate) waqf law
