The Supreme Court was lifted by the public interest, which sought the SIT probe into the accusation of the “vote of Chori”, made by Rahul Gandhi against the BJP and the Electoral Commission (EC).
A drank by a lawyer, lawyer Rohit Pandey, is looking for instructions from the Supreme Court to build a special investigative team (SIT) and look at the accusation of the opposition leader (LOP) in Lok Sabha in recent days. Gandhi claimed that during the elections of Lok Sabha, there was extensive handling of election blinds in Bengalur and several other constituencies.
“After meeting with credible revelations, including a press conference of 07.08.2025, the leader of the opposition in Lok Sabha, Mr. Rahul Gandhi, which concerns extensive manipulation with the names of the right voter, and includes records in election races in election roles in election roles in election roles in election roles Election recordings for election records in election zapiruses in election zapiruses.
The petitioner also stated that, in an independent verification of the authenticity of reports cited through publicly available government data, it was found that there was sufficient prima facie material that indicates that the accusation will reveal a systemic attempt to dilute and distort the value of legal votes. Therefore, he was looking for an urgent intervention from the Supreme Court.
“The accusation of diluting the purity of electoral roles directly undermines the constitutional vision of free and fair elections in the eyes of the community in general,” he says.
Pil is looking for the transparency of EC
The application also urges SC to submit instructions for and issuing binding instructions to the Electoral Commission to ensure transparency, responsibility and integrity in the preparation, maintenance and publication of electoral roles, including mechanisms for detecting and preventing duplicate or fictitious contributions.
He was also looking for the EC direction to publish election roles in available, machine-readable and OCR-compatible formats to allow meaningful verification, audit and public control.
(Tagstotranslate) Supreme Court
