Police maintain vigilia after two groups clashed on Wednesday evening after the smaller family filed a complaint against rape against the seniors in the Nao). File
The Uttarakhand High Court on Friday (May 2, 2025) descended strongly to the infinite administration for failing to follow the instructions of the Supreme Court on demolition and eliminating the penetration after issuing a demolition against House of Usman.
HC also rebuked the police for not controlling the situation in the law and ranking in Hill, adding that the heartless approach of the administration and the police supported the situation.
To mention that the Supreme Court last November, which was in November last year, stated instructions on the demolition of homes and private properties, which in November last year set out the instructions set by several states last November. The rules include a 15 -day previous announcement of passenger demolition, a fair opportunity for hearing, and video demolition videoography.
This matter was heard by the bench of the chief judge G. Narendra and the judiciary of Ravindra Maithani, who asked the civil body in the city, why should not be accepted by contempt because the instructions stipulated by the Supreme Court in the case of demolition were not fulfilled.
“You’re all going to rage like this … What is it.
An official of the civil body immediately issued an unconditional apology in court and stated that all 63 notifications issued against the accused would be immediately withdrawn.
“If we have to continue, we will continue to comply with the instructions set by the SC,” the official added.
During the hearing, the HC was also asked for the police superintendent of the police, the inhibited, the Prahlad Narayan Meena, why the police could not maintain the situation in law and order in the city, which is flooded with tourists.
“How do you explain that the accused was seen as the crowd inside the court, even if he is a police link? How do you explain that a video in which the crowd is running and police stands. The infrastructure that was damaged belonged to everyone. What steps did you take against these police officers.”
Attorney Kartikeya Hari Gupt, who represented Husna Begum, a 67 -year -old wife of a senior citizen who is charged with rape, argued before the court that the announcement of demolition came on the same day when the accused was arrested and the house was to be destroyed on May 3. He also begged to be court that his client has lived in this house in the last 20 years and has never been given any intervention notice.
“The current announcement has been issued as a degree of revenge, because the pressure groups in the city give it a common color. Since the last three days it has been helpless,” Gupta submitted in court.
He added that the defendant himself introduced the police, which was later arrested and is in judicial custody. Any violent demolition of the petitioner’s residence is contrary to the order of the Supreme Court, which banned such a vengeful demolition of the defendant’s property of the alleged crime.
On 6 May, at the next date of hearing, the High Court asked the police and the civic authority to submit a detailed report on their observance of the court’s instructions.
On Wednesday, after the minor was attacked by the accused, the municipal tension broke out in the middle after the minor was. The angry crowd filled the market, vandalized shops owned by Muslims and vehicles parked on roads. Due to the tension in the middle of the top tourist season, tourists remained limited to their hotel rooms at Kopcova station because the police carried out peace meetings to maintain the situation and order.
Published – 2 May 2025 9:19
