The petitioner Sanyam Gandhi appealed to the recent judgment of the Supreme Court in Gaurav Kumar, which concerned registration fees. File | Photo Credit: Hind
The Supreme Court refused to intervene in a petition that challenges the fee collected by the Indian Bar Association (BCI) by General, other back -class and planned candidates for tribes/planned tribes that appear during the All India (AIBE) bar test.
BCI charges 3,500 GBP from general/CITC candidates and 2,500 GBP and other random fees from SC/ST candidates.
Appearing in front of the bench headed by judge JB Pardiwala, petitioner Sanyam Gandhi, represented by the chief advocate of Guru Krishnakumar and advocate RAM Sankar, said the fee charged BCI was contrary to section 24 para. F) supporters of 1961 and disrupted the 1961 defense Act and disrupted the defense Act (1) (f) Defending Act (F) of 1961, and the Act of Permit (1) (f) of the defense Act, (f) and law that 19 (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f). (Equality) of the Constitution.
Mr. Gandhi appealed to the recent judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of Gaurav Kumar, which concerned registration fees. The Gaurav Kumar case was based on a petition against the State Council, which charges enrollment in thousands, when Section 24 of the Act of 1961 set only 750 GBP for graduates of law, who belong to the general category and 125 GBP from backward communities.
“We May Only Say That The Decision in the Case of Gaurav Kumar Would Apply in So Far As the Enrollment Fees are Concened. Hero is the Petitioner Should Understand COUNCIL OF INDIA WOULD INCUR HUGE EXPENSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING OF DOUGH EXAMINATION AND IF THEY Are Charging ₹ 3,500 and ₹ 2,500 Respective, as referered to Above, IT Cannot Be described any violation petition.
Published – September 2025 01:46 IS
