(Bloomberg) -The more US court averted a fresh appeal against weapons rights and refused to question the ban on the Columbia district on devices with large capacity munitions.
On Friday, the judges rejected the arguments of four firearms who stated that the ban violated the protection of weapons rights in the second amendment to the Constitution.
2. In any case, the Court fell one vote that was not needed to take the new case.
According to the Giffords Law Center, which supports weapons limitation, besides DC, 14 countries banned high -capacity ammunition feeding equipment.
The DC law makes it a crime to own magazines on weapons that they can organize more than 10 laps. Following the dominant decision of the Supreme Court 2008, it was adopted as a result of the decision of the district intervened a ban on the gun and first stated that the Constitution protects individual rights to weapons.
The federal judge and then the Court of Appeal confirmed the limitation of the DC.
Proponents of weapons rights who sued themselves to block the DC measures were tried to extend the Supreme Court’s decision of 2022, which declared a constitutional right to bear a firearm and performed a hard new test for limitation assessment.
The calls have stated that Americans have hundreds of millions of magazines with large capacities, many of which for self -defense purposes. Fans of prohibitions say that the device was repeatedly used in bulk shooting.
The law was supported at the level of the lower courts of Everytown for Gun Safety, the Advocacy Group founded and supported by Michael Bloomberg, the founder and majority of the parent company Bloomberg News Bloomberg LP.
The case is Hanson v. District of Columbia, 24-936.
More such stories are available at Bloomberg.com
(Tagstotranslate) weapons rights
