On Friday, the Supreme Court said that Trump’s administration would not be allowed to deport the group of Venezuelan detainees accused of being members of a violent gang under the unclear War Act. Trump responded to it and said that SC would not allow them to deport “criminals from the country”.
She stated that they were not given enough time to legally question their removal.
Trump, who led the campaign for the presidential election, promised to deport millions of undocumented migrants, responded to the court directive, and said, “The Supreme Court will not allow us to get criminals from our country!”
The decision of 7-2 Apex Court is another character for President Donald Trump’s attempts to quickly rule out the alleged concerning members of the Gang Tren de Aragua, who use the Extraterrestrial Laws of 1798 (AEA), which was last in force to deport the first group of alleged members of Tren de Aragu.
Attorneys representing a number of deported Venezuelans stated that their clients were not members of Tren de Aragua, did not make any crimes and were focused mainly on their tattoos.
April 19, the Supreme Court proceeded to temporarily stop further deportations of undocumented Venezuelan migrants and mentioned that a fair procedure must be provided.
Also read | Trump’s plan of mass deportation using a 200-year law will hit a pause-what to know
What did the judges say Friday?
On Friday’s unsigned order, the court stopped plans to deport another group detained in Texas and stated that they were not given enough time to start a meaningful legal competition to remove them.
“Note about 24 hours before removal, without information on how to exercise proper procedural rights to remove this removal, certainly does not go through the assembly,” AFP said as a proverb.
Conservative judges Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito disagreed.
The judges also noted that the Salvador man was deported to Salvador “by mistake” in addition to the alleged members of the Tren de Aragua in March and the Trump administration claimed that “it is unable to secure (his) return”.
While they emphasize that they have not decided whether Trump could legally use AEA to deport undocumented migrants, the judges asked the lower court to “quickly assess this question.
“To clarify this, today we only decide that the detention is entitled to more alert than it was given. We have not solved April – and now – we do not deal with the basic merit of the parties to AEA. He states, ”we say that it is stated with the institute,” we say that it is stated, ”we say it is stated on the basis of the way.
Also read | Trump cannot deport alleged gang members under the Law on Extraterrestrial Hostile Laws, NY Judge Rules
Three judges of the Federal District Court decided that Trump’s use of AEA to carry out deportations was unconstitutional, while one judge of the District Court, the denominator of Trump, ruled that it was admissible.
The US President, while AEA was called, claimed that Tren de Aragua was involved in “hostile actions” and “threatened the invasion or predatory invasions against the territory of the United States”.
From the time he took over the office, Trump sent soldiers to the Mexican border, imposed tariffs to Mexico and Canada to allegedly do not work reasonably to stop illegal crossings and determine the gangs as Tren de Aragua and MS-13 as terrorist groups.
(Tagstotranslate) Reports
