The Ministry of the Interior (MHA) informed Jamma, Kashmir and Ladakh the High Court, that it decided to grant the visa’s visa Rakshand Rashid, a Pakistani woman who was deported from Jamm after a terrorist attack to return to her family.
However, the court stated that the MHA order should not represent the precedent in any way.
Rashid (62), a Pakistani citizen who married Sheikh Zhoor Ahmed 35 years ago in Jammu, was deported as part of the Indian government’s decision to deport Pakistani nationals who remained in India as a result of the terrorist attack of Pahalgam.
Attorney General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the Ministry of the Interior, the court reported that after a significant conduct and on the basis of the special circumstances of this case, a fundamental decision to impose a visa of the visitor to Rashid was made.
The divisional bench, including chief judge ARUN PALLI and justice Rajnesh Oswal recognized it in his order.
The bench further noted that Rashid could follow both applications that moved it in terms of obtaining Indian citizenship and long -term visa.
The court noticed the submission of a general lawyer and noted that “once the competent authority is accepted in principle, there is no doubt that after compliance with the necessary procedures and formalities, the authority would process the visitor’s visa first”.
The Court rejected Rashid’s written proposal for relief from deportation and stated that as a natural consequence, the contested interim order loses its meaning, and thus ceases to exist and function.
22 July, Mehta asked the court to postpone the proceedings to allow him to explore whether the opponent could be in any way or whether it was still possible to deal with her concerns.
In response to the Rashid Council, Ankur Sharma and Himani Khajuria, she said she was acceptable for the course proposed by a general official.
On June 6, she ordered the Central Government to “get” Rashida, a one -aim bench of justice Rahul Bharti.
When admitting the Judge Bharti order, he noted: “This court keeps in mind the background that the petitioner had a long -term visa status (LTV) at the time of the moment, which had happened in itself, but without exploring her case in a better perspective and came up with a proper order.
Rashid was delivered to India 28. April 28 according to Section 3 (1), 7 (1) and (2) (a). (C) of the 1946 immigration and foreigners Act, issued by a criminal investigation department that ordered it to leave the country by April 29 or earlier.
She proceeded to the Supreme Court and sought temporary relief to keep the order.
However, it was issued to leave and accompanied itself on the border of Attari-Wagah in Amritsar by the authorities, from where it went to Pakistan.
Rashid, the inhabitants of Jammu’s Talab Khatikan, has four children who continue to stay in Jammu and Kashmir.
Rashid, daughter of Mohammad Rashida of Namuddin Road in Islamabad, entered India on February 10, 1990, via Attari on a 14 -day visitor visitor to visit Jamm.
She remained under LTV awarded annually. During her stay, she revealed that she had married an Indian national.
“It was not questioned that its LTV was valid until January 13, 2025 and she asked for an extension of 4 January 2025.
Her husband expressed his happiness over the decision and thanked the court.
“We are relieved … The whole family was under tension. We suffered because of the decision (deporting it),” he said.
(Tagstotranslate) Ministry of the Interior
