In 1989, the planned tribal/planned tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) of 1989 is amusement of appeal after 180 days after the courts of the courts after 381 days after the declaration of the judgment after 381 days to entertain the appeal after 180 days after the verdict of the courts.
“… legislation framers have done construction in which there is a total molding for entertainment after 180 days. With regard to the statutory bar, a delay of 381 days cannot be condemned,” the court said.
Judge V. Srishananda approved an order and dismissed the appeal by the State Government against the judgment of 7 September 2023 of the court meeting in the Yadgiri district and obtained six persons on the insulting of a member of the SC community in public opinion and other crimes committed in 2014.
The Public Prosecutor (SPP) claimed that the removal of the right of appeal only for the reasons of technology would be harsh in the present case and the complainant would be rejected only on a technical basis of 180 days.
However, the Court pointed out that Section 14-A (2) of the 1989 Act provides only 90 days to file an appeal before the High Court against the judgment of the courts, and after 90 days it will grant appeal within 90 days.
Section 4 (3) of the Act explains that “after the expiry of the period of 180 days there is no appeal, the court stated that after 180 days the power to entertain the appeal.
Meanwhile, the Court stated that it would be opened for SPP notification of the State Legislative Corps regarding the requirement to change the status if necessary to provide a dispute in such circumstances, where delay occurs due to reasons that cannot be attributed to the negligent court but for Bonafide.
Published – 28th July 2025 17:56
