Basanagouda Patil Yatnal | Photo Credit: File Photos
On Tuesday, the High Court in Karnataka remained another proceedings on the basis of the first information report (companies) registered against Vijayapura Mla Basanagoud Pedil Yatnal for alleged outrage of actor Kannad Ranya Rao, who was arrested in connection with the Golden Passes, through his removal case.
Judge Pradeep Singh Yerur approved the Provisional Order for the petition filed by Mr. Yatnal, which challenged the company registered by the High Grounds police in Bengalur on the basis of a complaint filed by one Akula Anuradha. The company was registered on 18 March according to Section 79 (outrage of the modesty of a woman) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Is not allowed
In the petition of Mr. Yatnal, it was claimed that the complainant had not been entitled to file a complaint with her. He pointed out that his statement, which is in the public sphere, indicated that it insisted on engaging the gaps in the system to prevent the smuggling of gold by hiding the same hiding in the passenger bodies, and did not move the modesty of women.
The statement made in the species of Cannada, which is often spoken in the northern part of Karnataka, is rustic and initially blush seems offensive. However, there was no intention to outrage the modesty of the accused person who allegedly participated in gold smuggling was required in the petition.
Ministers’ names
He claims that the complainant was set up with the exclusive intention of discouraging the petitioner from the publication of the names of two ministers because the petitioner issued a statement that he would publish the names on the floor of the legislative assembly. The petition also also claimed that section 79 BNS does not apply to the fact of the case.
Dr. In her complaint, Anuradha claimed that Mr. Yatnal, while adding the media, used humiliating and derogatory words against the wing and that the statement against the wing was inappropriate, humiliating and vulgar in nature.
Published – 1 April 2025 20:50 is
