View of the High Court in Karnatation.
The High Court in Karnataka refused to cancel criminal proceedings against the 44 -year -old Premier Research Institute in the city of accusing the sexual assault of eight smaller girls at his nine -year -old daughter’s birthday party in 2018.
The accused questioned the proceedings before court proceedings and quoted violations of the procedure, in particular the way the judge recorded the statement of the victims of girls under section 164 of the criminal proceedings (CRPC).
It was argued that section 25 CRPC mandates, that recording a judge’s statement under section 164 CRPC should be, as the child is called, but the statement of the victims recorded by the judge was literally the same.
However, the justice of M. Nagaprasann said that “however, the way of recording evidence of a learned judge would not deprive the strictness of every child.”
When the judge had not received Audiovideo, the court said the court stated that although recording is desirable through the electronic regime, its omission cannot derail the proceedings at this stage.
Background
The complaint stated that the accused by the petitioner during the birthday party for the pretext of playing some games touched the children inappropriately. Children complained about the incident to their parents, who later filed a complaint against the police after arguing with the accused the petitioner.
The petitioner, however, denied the accusation and claimed that some children preferred to play a “dark room” and had to enter the room because one child put the eye of another. The accused also claimed that the complainant who led other parents had some ax to crush him, and therefore the complaint was only registered to harass it.
Published – June 11, 2025 23:01 is
