Rabronnor Rabra Vishwanath Vishwanath ARLEKAR | Photo Credit: Thinter
Governor Kerala Rajendra Vishwanath Alelekar that the order of the Supreme Court, which sets the Governors a time plan that will act under the laws that the state lawmaker in the matter of Tamil Nadu could open for the government of Keral before the peak.
According to the laws approved by the state legislator and a challenge for the president, the possibility of a Governor’s instruction to act under the laws approved by the state lawmakers and a challenge for President Murm, to which he withholds four of the seven state laws, became a living opinion of the government under the State Act.
In a media interview, Mr. Alekar noted that the case of Tamil Nadu should be transferred to the constitutional bench. Governor’s reaction came to court with regard to the Kera’s petition in May.
It is necessary to find out whether the Indian Prosecutor General, which represents the Indian Union and the governor, will increase the requirement to send the case to a larger bench when the Topex court is considering the case.
Mr Alekar felt that the Supreme Court set the time limit for the governor to show his consent to the accounts, which was a constitutional change that was the privilege of parliament. He also noted that anyone who asks the governor to act in a certain period of time was not implicated in the constitution.
The governor wondered how two judges sitting at the Supreme Court could decide on the fate of the constitutional provisions.
Raj Bhavan resources claimed that the governor stood in an interview with the claim.
Interestingly, the government Keraly wanted her case to hear her case with the Supreme Court, consisting of justices JB Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, who passed the orientation order in the case of Tamil Nadu, because all her claims were covered by the bench command.
The General Prosecutor of India tried to go through the judgment. However, the chief judge of India refused to give up the plaintiff of the state and explained that the case would take place on 13 May.
P. Rajeeve, the State Minister of Law, felt that the Supreme Court would also consider the intention of the Constitution frames in the handover of the order in the case of Tamil Nadu.
“The governor was to criticize the judgment of the Supreme Court well under his rights. However, the Supreme Court’s decision is the country’s law. The Supreme Court also has the right to review the validity of the constitutional changes by parliament,” he said.
Published – April 12, 2025 20:59 IS IS
