In the first 100 days of his second term of office, US President Donald Trump found himself locked in a hard confrontation with federal judiciary. Several key court decisions blocked the controversial policy of his administration on mass shooting and deportations, which led to a growing legal battle. Trump replied with a sharp criticism of the judges involved. As the legal challenges are established, the clash between Trump’s administration and the courts became one of the most important aspects of his early period.
Federal judges push back against mass shooting
14 March, US district judge William Alsup in San Francisco ordered Trump’s administration to enjoy thousands of federal test employees who were released in February. Judge ALSUP, appointed by President Bill Clinton, considered the office of personnel proceedings (OPM) to be the office of mass missiles (OPM).
“It’s a sad day when our government fired a good employee and said it was based on performance when they know well and well, that’s a lie,” Alsup said.
Alsup criticized the administration for attempting to block the reigning director of OPM Charles Ezell before the testimony after Ezell’s written statement was downloaded.
Judge James Bredar, Maryland, also decided to release, issued a two -week stop and found that Trump officials were bypassing proper procedures.
Boasberg blocks deportation in the middle of defiance
On March 15, Judge James Boasberg issued a temporary restricting command blocking deportation according to Trump’s executive orders. However, the administration continued with deportation to the salvage and increased tension.
In court, Boasberg tried to order the return of deportation flights and claim that the administration was in an open defiance. According to CNN, Boasberg demanded the clarity of Trump’s use of the Law on Extraterrestrial Hostile Laws of 1798 to justify the removal and questioning the timing of deportations.
Trump later set out in Boasberg on a social truth, called him a “radical left -wing madman” and claimed, “This judge, like many crooked judges I have been forced to appear earlier, should be charged !!!”
Trump warns that the judges will exceed after the decision of the release
On March 17, Trump advocated his mass release about 30,000 test federal employees after two judges blocked this step. Trump described the decision “ridiculous” and warned that the judges had exceeded the presidential power. Judge William Alsup and James Bredar ruled the shooting of illegal, ordered the restoration and stopped for release.
Trump is raging against the court supervision
March 22, Trump warned that nationwide court orders issued by federal judges could lead to the “destruction of our country”. He accused the judge of the “usurping presidential authority” and demanded steps from the chief judge John Roberts.
“The illegal nationwide court orders of radical left judges could very well lead to the destruction of our country! These people are madmen,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.
He re -chosen Boasberg and described him “grandson looking for publicity”.
Legal failures for Trump
Within 24th March, the Ministry of Justice referred to the decision of Alsup to the US Supreme Court after he was ordered to restore the detonated workers. The administration framed its federal initiative of reducing size as a key reform of “inefficiency” in the government, supported by billionaire Elon Musk.
Separately, March 25, American district judge Patricia Millett fired Trump’s deportation policy at heated hearing and said: “The Nazis got more rights to question their removal from the United States during World War II”, according to Washington Post.
The commentary stressed the concern that Venezuelan migrants were denied basic legal rights.
Judges warn against constitutional violations
4th April Judge Paul Xinis ordered Trump to return Kilmar Armando Abrabo Garcia, accidentally deported with El Salvador.
“Since he was seized, it was unconstitutional,” Xinis said on the NPR.
The lawyers of the Ministry of Justice admitted that the deportation was an administrative mistake, but claimed that the judge had lacked the power because Garcia was no longer in custody of the US.
Meanwhile, Boasberg on April 16 decided that there was a “probable cause” to keep Trump officials in criminal contempt for ignoring the court order of the blocking deportation, The New York Times reported.
The Supreme Court interferes with
In the case of an emergency decision 7-2 on 19 April, the US Supreme Court temporarily blocked the administration of the use of the Act on Extraterrestrial Hostoral Laws on the Deportation of the Venezuelan detainees. The court ordered the government to “not remove any member of the supposed class detained until the next order”.
The federal judge in Colorado also ordered April 22 that the Venezuelans were notified 21 days before deportations and add other obstacles to Trump’s immigration intervention.
Trump warns against a “dangerous country” after delay of deportation of migrants
April 23, Trump again criticized the judge for blocking his efforts to deport migrants; Trump said in response to recent court decisions requiring a proper process of deportation that the system is not intended for mass court proceedings, and warned that the delay could cause the country to make a “very dangerous”.
Also read | Donald Trump says the Atlantic: “I run the Earth and the World”
Trump’s administration indicates the prosecution of judges
Standoff achieved a new extreme April 28, when the White House spokesman Karoline Leavitt suggested that the federal or even Supreme Court judges could face prosecution if they prevent federal immigration.
Asked if the administration arrests a judge, Leavitt said, “Anyone who violates the law or prevents federal officials to do so to perform their work is at risk of being absolutely prosecuted.”
She added that judges who help migrants avoid detainment commit a “clear case of obstacle”.
Also read | Trump’s 100 days: released thousands of federal employees, 275,000 impacts (Tagstotranslate) Trump Administration (T) Donald Trump (T) Donald Trump 100 days in office
