On Tuesday, the Allahabad High Court remained the arrest of Yash Dayal cricket in connection with the company against him for the alleged sexual use of a woman. The bench composed of judges Siddhartha Varma and Anil Kumar passed through the Dayal petition that challenged the FIR.
The Court of Justice, who remained in his arrest, asked the State Advisor to file a countermeasure and issue the complainant notification to file his counter on this matter.
Company against the 27 -year -old Dayal, playing for the Royal Challengers Bengalur (RCB) in IPL, was registered on July 6 at the Indirapuram Police Station in the Ghaziabad district according to Section 69 (sexual intercourse by deceptive means, etc.) BNS. Dayal has been charged with the sexual use of a woman under the pretext of marriage.
The petitioner’s advisor stated that a person may be accused of a crime under section 69 BNS only if it is proven that he promises to marry with a woman without intention to meet it.
However, he claimed that the bare perception of the averages made in companies reflects that the informant has been in a relationship with the petitioner in the last five years.
She was silent for a very long time, and as the petitioner was selected in the Indian cricket team, companies with a sloping motif were filed to blackmail difficult and arbitrary requirements, the Council further argued.
He said that the petitioner provided the informant financial support during the relationship.
In fact, the petitioner has never given any false promise to the informant. Moreover, the charges in companies do not publish that the petitioner had sexual intercourse with an informant fraudulent means. In fact, this company was an informant after the relationship between the parties was acidic.
Another government advocate claimed that the informant stated in her company that the petitioner used it permanently physically and in the last five years established a physical relationship and also introduced it to her family under the pretext of marriage.
The way the petitioner involved the informant with his family members is sufficient to show that the false promise of marriage.
The court said, “We looked at the company from which it is clear that the relationship between the parties continued for five years. At this stage, it is difficult to find out whether there has been a promise of marriage, or whether such a promise existed, it was false to obtain sexual consent.
“Until the next date of the statement or until the police report is submitted, depending on what is before, the petitioner will not be arrested,” the court added.
In his petition, Dayal tried to stay his arrest in this matter and also abolished the company registered against him.
According to the complainant, they both met about five years ago and Dayal promised to get married. The woman also claimed that Dayal was constantly postponing his proposal to marry, and eventually learned that Dayal was also involved with other women.
The complaint was originally presented on 21 June through the online portal of the main minister (IGRS) complaint.
– ends
Published:
Akshay Ramesh
Published on:
July 15, 2025
