Karen Read was recently exempt from a jury that considered her guilty in a court concerning her Boston police friend John O ‘Keefe’s death. It was a re-soud proceedings where the guilty was found, and the first court to see a suspended jury. Reading was accused of hitting her SUV on her friend outside Boston, outside the domestic party, where O’Keefe’s fellow officers were present.
What are the key ways from the court?
The court lasted significantly long and the reading was primarily charged with the murder of the second instance, killing and leaving the scene of the deadly collision of prosecutors. But her lawyers were able to defend her successfully and claimed that there was no such collision between reading and O’Keefe, who resulted in his death.
In addition, there were some interesting aspects from the beginning, which included the statement of reading lawyers that a group of local and state cops in this case protected one of their own and instead framed a woman. Even the main investigator in this matter, Michael Proctor, was released from the state police in Massachusetts after the first court proceedings because he was sent to him some inappropriate texts to his friends, family and collaborators just hours after he began investigating. His lyrics even included the claim that he wanted to read.
The ABC report on this court proceedings: “The advocates portrayed this case, as they intertwined with errors, incorrect steps and incorrect way. They stressed that rear light fragments were not found immediately and claimed that the police had time to take them from the seized vehicle and plant them.
“They also presented the video evidence that Taillight Read could have been damaged instead when the car O’Keefe was hit at home later in the morning,” the report continued.
(Tagstotranslate) Karen Read
