Shaubman Gill and Mohammed Siraj were left to the referees after the ball was changed during the first meeting of the second day of Lord’s test on Friday, July 11. The incident occurred in 91.
After several supplies of 91 years, when the second new ball was only 10.4 overs old, Gill complained about the shape of the ball. Referee Paul Reiffel brought a ring out of his pocket and did not pass the ball with the test. This signaled a change in the red icing that was used when the fourth referee came out with a ball box. The judges chose one ball and Gill was immediately unhappy with him.
ENG VS IN LORD’S TEST Day 2 Updates
He got into the animated cottage with the judge Sharfuddoula, who argued with the Indian captain. Gill did not understand himself and still complained before he was told to return to his position so that the game could restore.
Siraj went up to the referee and looked at the ball before he was heard on the stump microphone,
“This is the old ball 10 overs? Seriously?”
Stuart Broad, who was on the commentary, was surprised to see the ball changed so early and asked the last time 80 overs survived.
“I wouldn’t expect the ball to change, it’s work, isn’t it?”
“He is designed to endure 80 overs, but I can’t remember the last time he did.”
“10 is quite fast,” Broad said.
After a few breaks with a spare ball, it changed again because it did not go through the meter.
Indian team and the Duke’s ball saga
The Indian team was not in Dukes during the ongoing Ball fans Rishabh Pant and Gill express their displeasure with that. The hinge was fined for disagreement when his request to change the ball was not accepted.
Then after winning Edgbaston Gill publicly hit the ball, say that it causes the game to lose its essence.
“It is very difficult for the pitch.
The Duke Ball Manufacturer prevented its product Soon after the saga began to develop.
– ends
Published on:
July 11, 2025
Tune
