The judge of the High Court in Allahabad Sanjay Kumar Singh said that the woman “invited trouble” and was “responsible” for the alleged act of rape and at the same time awarded the bail to the accused. The estate claimed to be under the influence of alcohol and met a man in the bar. She raped her twice in her relative’s apartment after she agreed to go to rest, said, the Living Law reported.
“Was responsible”
The justice bench Sanjay Kumar Singh noted: “This court is of the opinion that even though the victim’s accusation is admitted as true, it can also be concluded that she invited problems and was responsible for it.
The bench added that the survivor, as a student of MA, was sufficiently able to understand “morality and importance of her actions”, as revealed in the first information report (FIR).
Survivor claims that the intoxicated accused has touched her inappropriately
According to Survivor, she came out of her own election to the bar in Delhi along with three friends, where she took alcohol, after which she became under the influence of alcohol.
She further claimed that she was at the bar until 3:00 in the morning, and during her time the accused stood tightly and told her to accompany him to her house. Since she required support for her condition, she agreed to go with him to relax. She also claimed that the man had inappropriately touched her during her journey, and instead of taking her to his residence in Noida, as she expected, he took her to the apartment of a relative in Gurgaon, where he allegedly raped her.
The accused’s advisor, while looking for bail, argued that although all the accusations were considered true, it is not a case of rape, but it may be the case of a consensus relationship between the two parties. The arguments have stated that the accused has remained in prison since December 2024, without a criminal history on his loan, and that if he is released on bail, he will not take advantage of bail and cooperate in ensuring a quick resolution of the case.
Another government advocate for the state disagreed for the prayer for the deposit of the applicant as a result of the company, but questioned the above -mentioned factual aspect of the matter, as stated on behalf of the applicant.
Bailies of bail
The Court ruled: “Given the facts and circumstances of the case, and also with regard to the nature of the enemy, evidence, the involvement of the accused and submitting the scholarly council for the parties, I believe that the applicant has shown bail.
(Tagstotranslate) High Court of Allahabad (T) Allahabad High Court News
