On Wednesday, the Supreme Court granted a temporary bail to Professor Ashok University Ali Khan Mahmudabad and ordered the Institute of Three members of a special investigation team (SIT) to explore the case.
The Top Court also reduced the professor to make any comments on the terrorist attacks on India or the countermeasure that India had given. The Supreme Court also ordered him to give up his passport, the press agency reported.
Mahmudabad was arrested on 18 May after two firs were submitted under strict accusations, including the threat of sovereignty and integrity, for his contributions to social media over the Sindoor operation.
It was made before the local court in Sonipat 18. May and was in police custody for two days in the case of a complaint from the State State Commission for Women (HSCW) filed the day before, the PTI press agency reported.
On Tuesday, Sonipat’s court returned him to his judicial custody until 27 May after his police custody.
HSCW recently sent him a notice of questioning notes, although Mahmudabad claimed that they were “misunderstood” and emphasized his fundamental right to freedom of speech, PTI said.
Two fir against profl khan Mahmudabad
Police Haryan said the two firs were filed at the Rai police station in Sonipat – one on the basis of a complaint by the President of the State Commission Haryan for Women, Rena Bhatia and others for complaints about the village of Sarpanch.
In a letter dated 16 May, the State DGP filed a complaint against the registration of companies against Mahmudabad “based on Prima Facia and Precedens”, the report said.
“Complaints of the chairman of the Commission were filed against Professor Ali of Ashok University according to BNS sections 152 (deeds threatening sovereignty or unity and integrity of India), 353 (statement for public misfortune), police actions focused on insulting women) and 196 (1) basis of representatives), “shelf on the basis of religion),” shelves on the basis of religion). said.
The case was submitted under the sections of BNS 152, 196 (support for hostility between different groups due to religion, race, place of birth, stay, language, etc. and to do prejudices to maintain harmony), 197 (impute, claim, prejudices against national integration) and 299 (intentional and harmful actions) and offensive) and offensive or religion) and offensive) and offensive or religious and religious).
All sections are harmless.
Why did his contributions become so controversial?
Mahmudabad’s notes were connected to the Commission announcement, and said in one of them that right -wing people applauding Col sofiya qureshi should require data lynching victims and “arbitrary” bulldozing real estate.
According to the PTI report, the associate professor was reportedly described by the media briefings of Col Qureshi and the commander of the wing of Singh as “optics”.
“But the optics must translate into reality on Earth, otherwise it’s just hypocrisy,” he added.
The Commission previously stated that the initial review of Mahmudabad notes raised concerns about “crushing women in uniform, including Col Qureshi and Singh’s wing commander, and undermines their role as professional officers in the Indian armed forces”.
(With the entry from agencies)
(Tagstotranslate) Supreme Court (T) Provisional Deposit (T) Ali Khan Mahmudabad (T) Special Investigation Team team
