The controversy and Tamil Nadu rn Ravi is inseparable.
Since the receipt of the constitutional leader of the State 18th September 2021, several of his official events and statements have triggered a huge political series. On several occasions, the Supreme Court pulled it. In the latter case, on 8 April 2025, the top court provoked the authority to declare up to 10 accounts on which he delayed the action effectively approved.
Here we look at five major controversies concerning Mr. Ravi. Among them do not include its disputed political position and opinions and the annual feature of refusal to read the approved text of the usual addresses of the governor into the house.
TN GOVT vs. Governor RN Ravi SC Judgment Live Adgrady
1. When the governor holds the consent to the bill, it means that “the account is dead”
In April 2023, Mr. Ravi said that if the governor detains his consent to the bill that the Assembly approved, it means that “the law is dead”. He claimed that the Supreme Court defined the detention of consent as a “bill”, which means that the bill is dead. “It is a decent language used by the word” reject “. When you say” detain “, the law is dead,” he told the civil service applicants in Raj Bhavan.
At that time, the Congress veteran and the former Minister of the Interior of the Union P. Chidambarama replied cryptically, “In fact, when the governor holds his consent for no valid reason, it means that” parliamentary democracy is dead “.”
In November 2023, the three -member bench of the Supreme Court of India, led by the chief judge Dy Chandrachud, was dealing with the case of Governor Pandjab, decided that the rejection of the Governor law did not mean his death. The law proposed by the state legislator is not only because the governor refuses to sign his consent, he said.
2.
In February 2022, Governor Ravi returned to the lecturer to the lecturer entry to Tamil Nadu to higher education 2021. The bill has sought liberation since adopted for non -public courses on MBBS/BDS and instead adopted students on the basis of class 12 stamps in government values in government chairs. The bill was drawn up on the recommendations of the Justice AK Rajan Committee. However, Mr Ravi stated that the Committee report only reflected the “yellow view” of the panel and the bill was not in the interest of students.
Ideally, in this case, the bill should submit the law to the President, because the proposed law was contradictory to the Central Act, which ordered the adoption based on Neet.
For the first time, the Tamil Assembly again regulated the bill returned by the governor and sent him back to Raj Bhavan. This time Mr. Ravi handed it over to the president, who has since refused consent.
In August 2023, Mr. Ravi said he could not, that he would never clear the Liberation Act. He claimed that Neet “stays in the ground”. During the interaction with students who cracked Neet, he said, “I tell you very honestly.
3. The release of Senthilabalaji and the Fast “U-Turn”
On the evening of June 29, 2023 Governor Ravi unilaterally “with the immediate effect” of V. Senthilbalaji from the Ministers Council, several hours after the Money washing case was arrested for enforcement (ED). “There are adequate concerns that the continuation of Thir V. Senthilbalaji on the Ministers Council will have an adverse impact on the proper process of law, including a fair investigation, which may eventually lead to the disintegration of constitutional apparators in the state.
The Chief Minister of MK Stalin retained Mr. Senthilbalaji as a minister without a portfolio. Minister of Law S. Regupatha said that Mr. Stalin would repeat the Governor that he was the privilege of the main minister to maintain or drop the minister.
Later that night, the governor hurried to his decision. He told the Chief Minister: “I was informed by the Dear Minister of the Union for Internal Affairs, that it would be reasonable to find the opinion of the prosecutor’s general. In accordance with this, it is close to me to further communication.” To date, Raj Bhavan did not share what the prosecutor General gave Mr. Ravi.
4. Refusing to induce again ponmuda to the cabinet
In March 2024, the governor refused to recall K. Ponmuda into the cabinet, although the Supreme Court suspended his conviction in case of corruption. Mr. Ravi wrote to the main minister and argued as Mr. Ponmuda “He remains defiled from corruption, re -invoking, because the minister would be against the constitutional morality and therefore I cannot access your request.”
Later, the chief judge of India Dy Chandrachud killed Mr. Ravi for the “resistance of the Supreme Court in India” by refusing Mr. Ponmudy to re -induce the minister. “In this case, we are seriously concerned about the behavior of the Governor. We did not want to say it out loud in court. The Supreme Indian Court rejects … When two judges said the Supreme Court,” said the chief judge, “the chief judge said.
The governor then managed the oath and secret to Mr. Ponmuda.
5. The NIA probe on an attack on gasoline
In the afternoon of October 25, 2023, the man threw Molotova cocktail at the main gate of Raj Bhavan in Chennai. The police overwhelmed him and took him into custody. The police said the accused was a historic Cheet named “Karukka” Vinodha, which was involved in similar cases of attack in several other places.
However, Raj Bhavan said that more than one person was involved in a “very drastic and serious attack” that occurred against the constitutional head of State Tamil Nadu. He said that some miscreants, armed with gasoline bombs, tried to deepen the main gate No. 1 Raj Bhavan. “After the first gasoline bomb was thrown at the main entrance gate of 1 Raj Bhavana, burst with huge sound and burned the entrance. The security staff threw himself to capture miscreants. Even though the security staff of Raj Bhavan attempted to speak Assil He was over the fact that he was over the need to conquer for safety, ”he said.
A day later, Raj Bhavan accused the Police of the Suo Moto to dilute the attack “as an act of simple vandalism”. He said that in a hurry the police accused the accused: “preventing a detailed interrogation that could reveal those behind the attack.”
Subsequently, the National Investigation Agency took over the probe in this case. The Nia indictment filed in January last year mentioned Vinodha as a lonely accused, rejecting the claim of Raj Bhavan that more attackers were involved.
Published – April 8, 2025 02:58
