TELANGANA High Court in Hyderabad. | Photo Credit: File Photos
Judge Namavarap Rajeshwar Rao ordered the state government on Thursday on Thursday not to issue appointment letters to candidates selected for Group I.
However, the judge stated that the government may continue to verify the certificate of candidates selected for Group I contributions.
The interim direction was approved by the judge after the claims submitted to two consecutive days by the leader B. Rachn Rachn Reddy for the petitioner and advisor TGPSC RajashEkhar in a written petition filed 20 candidates who appeared for the main exam I called TGPSC.
The petitioners were looking for a direction to order “court investigation” or independent “judicial investigation” regarding numerous “inconsistencies, inconsistencies and illegality in the evaluation process”. They wanted HC to either reconsider or review the intensity of detected irregularities for all candidates to re -release the list of general assessments.
Rachn Rachn’s attorney quoted that several methods followed by commissions in performing the main tests of the group I sent seeds suspicion between the minds of candidates. The candidates have been issued by various Hall tickets for preliminary and main tests. Initially, TGPSC announced that the total main test center was 45, but increased it to 46 through another announcement.
When the results were announced, the candidates were allowed to see the grades only through their relevant web applications, the advisor said. The Commission could not explain how the results of the main test of 10 candidates for 21,075 candidates, which previously claimed as the total number of candidates who attended the main tests, said Mrs. Rachna Reddy.
The candidate, the Bommo poini Reddy, with the Hall No. 240918702, who applied for overwriting, was shocked when he found that 60 of its brands were reduced. The petitioners’ advisor claimed that some of the 500 charts came from several investigative centers. The response sheets collected from each center were handed over to the evaluators without mixing.
Meanwhile, TGPSC’s lawyer refuted the claims of the applicants of irregularities and assured the bench to provide all necessary details and procedures followed by the Commission in conducting the main examination.
Referring to the claim that one candidate received reduced grades after the narrative, said the candidate was issued a notice of the cause after the suspicion that the data was manipulated, the attorney said. The petitioners, most of whom were in government service, did not mention which department they work on as the designation, he said.
The thing was sent to 28 April for another hearing.
Published – April 18 2025 05:07
