The New York Times report, which connects the company that is part of the British Air Major with the State State of the Indian Defense Company, claiming that the latter is in relation to the Russian agency is “actually incorrect” and “misleading”, said official sources on Monday.
The report indicated that military hardware supplied by the British company of the Indian company could reach the Russian agency Rosoboronexport.
The report “tried to plow problems and distort the facts to suit the political narrative”, said sources and added the media socket “overlooked” basic due diligence.
“The Indian entity listed in the report conscientiously managed all its international obligations concerning strategic business inspections and end -users’ obligations,” the source said.
“The Indian robust legal and regulatory framework on strategic trade continues to lead overseas business companies with its companies,” he said.
“We expect renowned media outputs to be performed by basic DUE diligence in the publication of reports that were clearly overlooked in this case,” the source said.
The New York Times report, which quoted “documents”, claimed that one of the largest corporate donors of the populist reform of the United Kingdom sold almost 2 million transmitters, cockpit devices, antennas and other sensitive technologies to the main supplier of Moscow black state weapons.
From 2023 to 2024, a company that was part of the British Aerospace Group Aerospace HR Smith Group supplied a device to the Indian company, which is the largest business partner of the Russian arms agency.
“The records do not show that HR Smith products have ended in Russia. But they show that in some cases the Indian company has received equipment from HR Smith and sent a role to Russia with the same product identification codes within a few days,” the report said.
HR Smith said that its sale was legal and equipment was intended for Indian search and rescue network, NYT report.
Parts “Support for rescue operations” and are not “designed for military use”, the company quoted a company as a society.
The spokesman of the reform party stated that the gift from the company was “statutory” and “such a pitiful attempt to blur the reform will not work”, according to the report.
(Tagstotranslate) Russian agency
