Founder Jan Suraj Prashant Kishhor questioned the decision of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-Mored Union to agree to end hostility with Pakistan after four days of operation of the military event Sindoor last month. The political strategist political political politician has suggested that the stopping of India could be a missed opportunity for the Indian army so that it could further move its advantage.
Also read | PM Modi in Bopal: Sindoor Operation and Symbol “Naari Shakti” | Top 7 citations
Kishhor said: Pakistan, who went to Jaishankar on external matters with Jaishankar, wanted to end, suggesting that the neighboring country was under pressure and is afraid of defeat.
“I think if Pakistan wanted a ceasefire, as our Foreign Minister says, it means that our army has done a good job, we defeated Pakistan. It had to be for fear that Pakistan wanted a ceasefire. So if Pakistan wanted to agree with the army?
Kishhor Priased Jaishankar called him “very educated and sensible”. “In terms of ceasefire, Eam Jaishankar of our country is a very educated and sensible person. I have great respect for him. I read his statement where he said that the ceasefire was made on the Pakistani initiative,” he added.
India performed accurate strikes under the Sindoor operation on nine terrorist infrastructures in Pakistan and Pakistan occupied Kashmir, 7th May in response to the terrorist attack of Pahalgam, killed by 26 people, mostly tourists in Jammu and Kashmir.
After the Indian event, Pakistan tried to attack Indian military bases 8th, 9th and 10th May. Pakistani experiments were strongly responded to the Indian side by causing great damage to a number of key Pakistani military installations, including air foundations, air defense systems, command and control centers and radar sites.
Also read | Nitish Kumar is not the first choice for Bihar cm. So who is? Survey C-Voter says …
However, both nations agreed to understand the military event on 10 May. Kishhor said the situation on Earth indicated that the Indian army was under control.
“We had them on the back leg”
“That’s exactly what our army staff say, what the citizens of this country say that during the fight we left them on the back leg, the sirens left, people hid, Pakistan was defensive and begged for a ceasefire.”
Kishhor referred to the Jaishankar’s comments, saying it was that they were militarists of both nations who negotiated directly and resolved the conflict through an agreement and understanding to stop fire and military action.
“So why did you stop the event? Should it continue for a few more days. And if you went on a ceasefire, why wrong public?
Kishhor also questioned the claims of foreign leaders about who led peaceful efforts.
“Although Trump said something else that he did it and deserves the price of the peace of Da Nobel’s peace, from Peace of Brekenring. But why should we believe what Trump said?
Also read | Tharoor “disappointed” over Colombian condolences to Pakistan after ops sindoor
May 23, days after the President of the United States Donald Trump claimed that he played a role in settling the escalating tension between India and Pakistan, Jaishankar repeated that they were a direct negotiated militation of both nations.
Nothing can be achieved by simply layout of Sindoor boxes.
Kishhor’s statement comes before the Bihar Assembly elections, which will be held in October-List of November this year, where the NDA, which consists of BJP, JD (U) and LJP, is again looking forward to returning to power. On the other hand, the Indian block will give competition to the existing Nitish Kumar government. Jan Suraaaj is competing this year’s first elections in Bihar this year.
(Tagstotranslate) Prashant Kishor