On Saturday’s election commission of the Indian Commission (ECI) stated on Saturday that such a step on Saturday stated that such a step of the Electoral Commission (ECI) stated on Saturday that such a step of the Electoral Commission (ECI) said on Saturday that such a step was on Saturday the ECE (ECI).
ECI sources say that calls for public release of shots can be politically motivated to bother or profile voters, especially in the stalls where the party plays bad.
At the beginning of this month, the opposition leader (LOP) in Lok Sabha demanded that ECI to publish consolidated, digital, machine -readable voters for Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra, including Maharashtra.
Congress leader accused the BJP of elections to the Maharashtra elections in 2024 through a five -speed process, including manipulation with the election commission and inflated electoral participation.
ES accepts the release of shots from election stations
According to PTI press agency, ES officials said that while such demand suits its narration to sound quite original and in the interest of voters and protect the democratic process, it actually focuses on achieving exactly the “opposite goal”.
Officials claimed that what is shrouded as a very logical demand is in fact “in contrast to concern for the protection of personal data and security of voters, the legal status set out in the representation of the Act on People from 1950 and 1951 and the instructions of the Supreme Court.
Also read | EC asks Rahul Gandhi to file a complaint directly to the “exclusive” claimAlso read | The Election Commission will refute the claims of Rahula Gandhi in the Maharashtra elections in 2024
Sharing shots that would allow easy identification of voters by any group or individual would leave voters who voted, as well as a voter who did not vote vulnerable to pressure, discrimination and intimidation with anti -společný elements.
The creation of the example stated that if a particular political party received a smaller number of votes in a particular booth, it would be easy to identify through CCTV shots that voters voted and which voters did not and then, according to the report, bother or intimidate them.
Maintaining the privacy and secrets of the voter is unegeothable to the EC and has never been endangered by the basic principle stipulated in the law and the Supreme Court has been confirmed, the officials said.
Rahul Gandhi vs ec
The leader of Congress claimed that the elections of the assembly held in the Mahari and Haryana last November were “equipped” in favor of BJP. Congress and its allies suffered a massive defeat in both elections.
In the written OP-ED called “Match-Fixing Maharashtra”, Rahul accused BJP of the Maharashtra election assembly equipment through a five-speed process, including manipulation with electoral turnout.
In response to Rahul’s accusation, she issued a point of refusion, marked them “absurd” and said that Rahul raised “irrelevant accusations”.
“Any misinformation that is spreading is not only a sign of disrespect for law, but also brings the thunder to thousands of representatives named their own political party and demotivates the Lakh election employees who work tirelessly and transparently during the elections,” EC said.
“After any unfavorable voter judgment, it is to slander the election commission by being at risk is completely absurd,” he said.
Rahul then killed the body of the vote and said that “unsigned, avoiding notes to intermediaries is not a way to respond to serious questions.”
While he demanded EC release after 5:00 CCTV shots from election cabins, Rahul said in post X: “The escape will not protect your credibility. It is said to be the truth.”
(With the entry from agencies)
(Tagstotranslate) Indian Election Commission
