On Wednesday, the Theangana High Court ordered the Bucodan and the State Government to submit details of countries donated by different persons during the Boodan movement.
Judge K. Lakshman, who heard two separate pleas looking for investigations of the Bhodon Lands status in the village of Nagaram Maheshwaam Mandal in Ranga Reddy, went through a temporary direction. He also wanted the Bucodan and the government to provide details of land redistributed to without land and the current state of all ground land held by the Council.
Another general advocate T. Rajanikanth Reddy said that the government is ready to issue an inquiry commission if the court ordered a probe to all countries belonging to the Body Board and problems with it. In the present case, however, the government opposed such an inquiry commission because the petitioners reported for a private cause, he said.
The petitioners claimed that some persons acquired ownership of the land held by the Bhodonan Council, which were transferred to the conspiracy with the income and other officials of the department. According to them, parts of these lands under specific survey numbers were sold out by mediators to a number of IAS and IPS officers. Some of them are now retired.
Previously, the only judge HC ordered the government to maintain certain countries set by one of the petitioners in the prohibited list until the action decision. The serving and pensioners of the officials who have been made in this written petition moved the bench of the division headed by the then reigning chief judge on vacation on the order for restrictions.
The bench, however, ordered them to approach the bench of a single judge to change the order that was accepted. The officers argued that the problems raised about the transfer of the Earth Bucodan were one of the four different issues of the survey. They argued that the land they bought were not associated with the Bhodon Board at all.
The consultant for the petitioner looking for the Inquiry Commission did not appear on Wednesday at the meeting and sought the time to present arguments. Advice for higher officials claimed that the petitioners moved HC without any locus standi. Courts cannot accept orders to put land on a forbidden list without submitting the proposers to have proof of dispute ownership, he said.
Problems would be heard again on Thursday.
Published – July 30, 2025 20:22 is
