The Karnatak High Court stated that the 2014 official official acting under the provisions of the Carnataka (KTCDA) tanks (KTCDA) tanks may initiate parallel proceedings on the eviction of persons allegedly interfering with the Lake land under Karnatak. grabbing) (KRNGG) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGP) (KRNGG) (Krhataka (Krataka) (Klggp).
“… this Court is of the considered View that Despite Both Enactments Namely, The KlgP Act, 2011, and KTCDA Act, 2014, Containing Non-Obstante Clauses, The Second Proviso to Sub-Section (9) Parallel Remedial Action Under Any Other Law Even When ProCedings Are Initiated Under the Klgp Act, ”The Court Said.
The petition refused
Judge Sachin Shankar Magadum approved an order and at the same time rejected the petition filed by GV Manjunath and others who questioned the announcement issued in November 2024, a justified official under the KTCD Act when the case was registered in 2013.
The petitioners claimed that they had a valid Khata of Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagata Palike for their buildings built in survey 158/2ab Vibhuthipura, Kr Pura Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk.
The petitioners argued that the show causes notification of their eviction issued by an authorized official if the question of intervention before the Special Court of Sub-Soudce is.
Legally authorized
The High Court, which rejected the petitioners’ claim, stated that the authorized official under the KTCDA law is legally authorized to initiate an independent investigation to see if the petitioners are in unauthorized employment of tank land and take the necessary measures.
“If, after such an investigation and provision of the petitioners, a reasonable opportunity to be heard has been found that the petitioners have interfered with the tank land, an authorized official who is a competent legal authority, is under his powers to continue the summary of the proposal.
POINTING OUT THAT KTCDA ACT STATES THAT IF The Authorized Officer is Found to Have Failed in Discharging HIS DUTIA OR HAS ACTED IN DERELICTION THEREF Provision Reinforces That The Authorized Officer is Not Left Unchecked and Is Answerable for Omissions and Commissions While Discharging His Responsibilities.
Published – August 8, 2025 20:45
