Tammy Beaumont vs India (picture via x/screenngrab) The discussion developed from the Lord during the second woman Odi between India and England, which this time leanked in favor of hosts after victory for India in the first. In the fifth of England, Deepti Sharma bowed to Tammy Beaumont fuller delivery. The English opener drove it towards Jemimah Rodrigues in the short midwicket. Rodrigues plunged to the right, stopped the ball and threw him back to Wicketkeeper Rich Ghosh. Beaumont, whoocut the shortcut of her run after she decided against a quick single, went back to the fold. After putting her left leg into the fold, with his right leg seemed to try to kick the ball away. Although she was not necapped, she seemed to try to stop the ball with her leg before reaching Ghosha.Visitors appealed without failure and showed the referees that Beaumont had tried to interfere with the throw. The judges had a long discussion and decided to review. After watching several repetitions, the third referee decided that Beaumont was not out. According to laws, however, there is no exception to protect the dough from giving away the field, even if they are back inside the fold. The ball was still in the game at that time, which is clear from the fact that he moved towards the Indian goalkeeper.
37 Babbing field
- 37.1 Out prevents the field
- 37.1.1Either the dough prevents the fields, if, with the exception of the circumstances of the clause 37.2, and while the ball is in the game, it intentionally tries to defend or disperse the field aside by word or action. See also clauses 34 (hit the ball twice).
- 37.1.2 The attacker prevents the fields, if, with the exception of the circumstances of the clause 37.2, when receiving the ball supplied by the pitch, deliberately strikes the ball of the hand that does not hold the bat. This will apply to whether this is the first strike or the second or subsequent strike. The act of accepting the ball extends to playing on the ball and to hit the ball more than once to defend her goal.
- 37.1.3 This clause is used if there is no ball called.
- 37.1.4 To avoid doubts, if the referee feels that the dough has changed significantly when the dough between the goals has changed its direction without the probable cause, thus preventing a profile attempt in the field, the dough should be distributed and prevented the field. It will not be relevant whether or not. If the direction of direction includes the dough of crossing the pitch, the clause 41.14 is also used.
In addition, it was mentioned in another clause that the dough would not be outside if the field prevented randomly to avoid injury or in the case of the second/subsequent strike that became legal to protect the goal (for the attacker).However, the decision that is not outside did not hurt India much about the admission of running, since Beaumont fired at 25 out of 16 balls at the time and later was rejected by a snune at the 11th of 35.
Vote
Should Tammy Beaumont be distributed for defending the field?
England Level Series After Rain Hit Win
In the match itself, England bounced back to win the second ODI with eight goals in the rain twisted to Lord’s. Opener Amy Jones, who persecuted the revised goal 115, led the host of home with an undefeated 46 and helped them balance the three-way series 1-1. India, which successfully chased 259 in the first ODI, fought with the bat. In the 29-Covers-Pper-Side match, they managed only 143/8, with the highest score of Mandhana with 42.
