New Delhi: Promoters trying to stop bankruptcy by repaying creditors will have to set up fees in early phase, instead of waiting for competitive offers of potential investors, according to changes in the Indian insolvency and bankruptcy Code (IBC) now before parliament, experts said.
The bill on insolvency and bankruptcy (amendment), 2025 seeks to rework the rules for the selection of declining proceedings by limiting the settlement to the early window and requiring approval from 90% of creditors, a step focused on limiting tactical delays and ensuring the integrity of the bid process.
The bill prevents the organizers to offer the organizers one by one lenders who have become a desperate company under the administration of a professional invitation of offers from new investors.
Also read | The new ED book can mitigate the issue of bankruptcy
This prevents the promoters from pulling their legs until they get an idea of what the company can bring to the market, and then explain the additional offer of settlement, experts explained.
The new mode is designed by replacing section 12A IBC with a reworked version. Section 12a IBC deals with the bankruptcy of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
The proposed changes stipulate that only the administrator of a desperate company appointed by the creditor may move the tribunal to select bankruptcy, which also with the consent of 90% of the creditors by value. Currently, the promoter can directly move the selection applications.
A limited opportunity to settle down
The opportunity for the organizers to deal with creditors is limited between the time when the creditors panel is established, and offers are invited to the company. Tribunals must also decide on such applications within one month or record reasons delay.
Experts have pointed out that it effectively prevents both “tactical delay” that resorted to settlement with creditors and attempts to derail the offer process with the offering at the last minute.
Also read | IBC Revamp: Debt Resolution outside the court can be limited to top creditors
The overwork of the selection of bankruptcy proceedings is a key reform, as the promoters of 1,192 companies have settled with creditors according to section 12A IBC after the courts adopted proposals for bankruptcy. This accounts for about 14% of 8,492 cases admitted in the tribunes from the IBC entry into force in 2016 to June.
The withdrawal of proceedings according to Section 12a was the main cause of the lawsuit within IBC, said Prateek Kumar, Partner, Khaitan & Co., a law firm.
In several cases, 12A were offered in a late stage and conspired against the solution plan, leading to delay and dispute, Kumar said.
“The prescribing a specific time window in which the proposal 12a must be submitted will be supported by transparency. The additional obligation of the court for the National Society Act would decide on selection within 30 days would certainly speed up settlement,” Kumar said.
Promoters trying to maintain desperate assets would now have to take proactive steps to achieve an agreement before the adoption of insolvency, he said.
The change limits the scope of promoters to settle with selected creditors before creating a creditors’ committee (COC) or a delay in the evaluation of the value offered by applicants for solutions in Bona Fide, added Kumar.
Also read | Government to maintain IBC sector-agnostics despite industry requirements
“We have often seen the promoters waiting for the table’s plans to make their own settlements. The courts, including the Supreme Court, warned against such a late intervention that they disrupted this process. The proposed change directly solves this mischief by bringing clarity and discipline.” Ltd.
Historically, promoters used withdrawals to delay the solution of business insolvency solutions, said Subodh Dandawate, associated director-regulatory services at NexDigm, company for business and professional services.
Hit the balance
Jhunjhunwala reported that the reworked section 12A disrupts the balance and gives creditors a chance to consider the settlement, but from preventing departures that derail the offer, applicants’ efforts, and undermine confidence in the trial.
By limiting the possibility of downloading at the initial phase, promoters who want to match will have to quickly mobilize funds and participate with creditors in advance, Jhunjhunwala added.
This discourages concentration slowly and forces promoters to deal with urgency, if they are serious about repayment, she said.
The strict timeline brings this process of clarity and certainty and helps prevent tactics and ensures that only serious promoters perform redemption, thereby improving the effectiveness of the insolvency process, Dandawate of NexDigm said.
(Tagstotranslate) Bankrupt -sbornik
