
The justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, a NCLAT member, has re -appeared from hearing the matter. Photo: nclat.nic.in
In the rare incident, a court member of the National Law of the Court of Appeal (NCLAT), who “addressed one of the most respected members of the higher judiciary”, who sought an order for the benefit of the party and re -heard himself to hear the case.
The bench of the appeal Tribunal, based in Chennai, even recorded an incidence in the two -parás order, approved by August 13.
The justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, a NCLAT member, has re -appeared from hearing the matter.
“We are stunningly observed that one of us, a member (judicial), was approached by one of the most respected members of the higher judiciary of the country for finding an order in favor of a particular party. Therefore, I am annoyed,” NCLAT said.
She asked the matter to be placed “before the chairman of Hon’ble for the nomination of a suitable bench” for hearing.
The two -member bench included Judge Sharma and Technical member of Jatindranath Swain.
The bench heard the appeal lodged as Reddy, suspended director of KLSR Infratech based in Hyderabad, faces the process of solving the company insolvency solution (CIRP) within the insolvency and bankruptcy Code (IBC).
The judgment in the matter was reserved for the insolvency Court of Appeal 18 June 2025 after the hearing was completed. Both parties also granted seven days of time to submit written posts if they exist.
The thing was listed on the orders of August 13, 2025 before the two -member Chennai Bench, which includes Judge Sharma and Swain.
However, when the matter was called, Judge Sharma said this matter and mentioned the reason for the two-para that he handed over that day.
The CIRP launched the Hyderabad Labs National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) against the KLSR Infravy regarding the action filed by its creditor as Met Corp PVT LTD 14. July 2023.
The Order was asked like Reddy before NCLAT.
Judge Sharma, who left the High Court in Uttarakhand 31.
He also turned from hearing a matter for Ed-Tech’s insolvency, because he had previously appeared as a lawyer to check cricket control in India (BCCI).
Previously, he also turned from hearing related matters related to Jeppiaar Cements and Ramaling Mills.
Read more
Published – August 26 2025 22:19 is