Ever since concerns about the privacy practices of Meta’s AI smart glasses surfaced, social media platforms have been buzzing with warnings that users may be unknowingly sharing more than they realize.
One user wrote Reddit“Meta carefully combs through all your videos by hand and marks what’s in the footage to help train the AI. Everything you upload, assume it sees it all.”
Another user commented, “Horrifying that some nurses wore them while working, handling patients and charts. Some admins let it go if the nurse says they don’t record while caring for patients.”
What’s the Privacy Controversy for Meta Smart Glasses?
The online debate intensified after a Swedish newspaper investigation reported that contractors at an outside facility reviewed footage captured by Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses users, including highly sensitive recordings.
The issue has sparked regulatory scrutiny abroad and a lawsuit in the United States against Meta Platforms over allegations that consumers were misled about the device’s privacy protections, TechCrunch reported.
Read also | Interested in the details of your Meta Ray-Ban AI glasses? Here’s what you should do
The controversy unfolds at a time when smart glasses are gaining traction globally as a wearable tech gadget. More than seven million Meta smart glasses are said to have been sold by 2025, according to figures in legal filings.
Unlike smartphones, the glasses resemble regular glasses, but can capture photos, videos and audio from the wearer’s point of view, potentially recording people around them without their knowledge.
The revelations prompted the UK’s data regulator, the Information Commissioner’s Office, to ask Met to explain how such footage is processed and scrutinised.
Why is this a concern?
Legal experts say such situations could raise questions under India’s Privacy Act 2023 if recordings made by wearable devices involve Indian users.
Apurv Sardeshmukh, managing partner at Stride Legal, said consent is a basic requirement under the law.
“Access to sensitive footage can only be given to external staff with the consent of the people affected by the footage,” he said.
“If such data occurs without the consent or knowledge of the person concerned, it will be a breach of the law.”
Read also | Meta to make WhatsApp available to rival AI chatbots for a fee after EU objectionsRead also | Meta and AMD agree on AI chip deal worth more than $100 billion
Is it illegal to share content without consent in India?
Experts say devices like smart glasses represent a new frontier in data collection as they blur the line between everyday life and digital recording.
Neethi VK, a partner at QL Partners, said wearable AI technologies are raising fundamental questions about how personal data is processed.
“While Meta promises privacy by design, such as LED lights to indicate recording, it falls short of the fundamentals of processing data from recorded individuals,” she said.
“There is no purpose limitation or minimization of data for the entities that are recorded.”
She added that outsourced review of user recordings also poses additional risks.
“Content moderation is nothing new in the IT services industry. In addition to the risks of misuse or misappropriation of records, there are also concerns about the mental health and wellbeing of workers viewing sensitive material,” she said.
Cross-border data risks
Another layer of complexity arises when personal data captured by such devices is accessed outside the country.
Ankit Sahni, partner at Ajay Sahni & Associates, said companies need to ensure compliance with Indian safeguards even when data is processed abroad.
“If Indian users’ recordings are accessed by suppliers based in another country, companies must ensure that these suppliers adhere to the same security and confidentiality safeguards required by Indian law,” he said.
A much larger AI data ecosystem
Experts also point out that wearables are not just recording tools, but part of a much larger AI data pipeline.
Raheel Patel, a partner at Gandhi Law Associates, said recordings captured by smart glasses can go through several layers of processing.
“The recordings are usually uploaded to company servers, analyzed by artificial intelligence systems and sometimes reviewed by humans for quality control,” he said.
“This means that extremely personal data – faces, voices, surroundings and behavioral patterns – can be stored and processed far beyond the user’s immediate control.”
What does Meta say?
Meta said that protecting personal data is a top priority and that it is constantly improving its tools and processes to strengthen privacy protections.
“Ray-Ban Meta glasses help users access AI hands-free to answer questions about the world around them,” the company told BBC News.
The tech giant added that when people share content with Meta AI, it can sometimes rely on vendors to review certain data to improve the user experience with the glasses — a practice outlined in its privacy policy.
“This data is first filtered to protect people’s privacy,” the company said.
Meta noted that such filtering could include measures such as blurring faces in images. However, sources cited by Swedish publications SvD and GP claimed that this system does not always work effectively and that faces can sometimes still be visible.
Even if users have to manually activate recording or use a voice command, they may not always be aware that their photos or videos may be reviewed by human moderators – an option described in Meta’s detailed privacy policy and terms of service.
