The long -term link between the lawyer Jai Anant Dehadrai and Trinamool Congress (TMC) MEP Mahu Moit over their rotvaler on behalf of Henry reached the High Court in Dilli, questioning Dehadrai by a court order that ruled him from public hearing, informing about the bar and belly.
On Wednesday, September 3, the judiciary of Manoi Jain issued a announcement to Mahu Moitr and was looking for her answer to Dehadrai’s petition. The court also suggested that the parties try to resolve the dispute outside the courtroom.
“Why don’t you sit together and solve it? What relief is he looking for in a suit?” During the hearing, the bar asked Judge Jain.
This matter will be heard next 22.
Why did Dehadrai approach the High Court in Delhi?
Dehadrai challenged the Regulation on March 2025 by the Saket court, which limited both parties to submit any public statements on the ongoing legal proceedings.
The Ex-Parte Court’s order came after Mahua Moitr filed a lawsuit seeking shared care for a dog Henry. Jay Anant Dehadrai claims that the extensive order of Roublík violates his constitutional right to freedom of speech.
“There is a frivolous case against me and I can’t talk about it, I can’t discuss it, I can’t write about it? According to the Bar and Bench report, Sanjay Ghos, who appeared for Dehadrai, argued.
What triggered the ranking of the gag?
Jay Anant Dehadrai previously published a statement on the Social Media Platform X (formerly Twitter) of a dispute without revealing any details of the case.
However, the Court considered the position as a violation of his March order and issued another interim court order of ex-Parte, which directed him to remove the post and refrain from publishing further notes.
Dehadrai said he followed the order by undressing, but doing so “in protest”.
His legal team claims that the order was excessive and unnecessary, especially because, as Ghos emphasized, “no privacy angle was involved in the matter to give the order of the gag.”
What arguments were submitted before the High Court in Delhi?
Jai Anant Dehadrai’s advisor relied on the decision of the High Court in Delhi in Ajay Kumar v. The Indian Union, which deals with the limitation of the orders of gag and freedom of expression.
The High Court questioned why Dehadrai had previously withdrawn his request before the court court instead of promoting him to challenge the order directly.
“If this judgment applies to you, this order should not be approved. Why did you resign (your) request (previously submitted before the court court against his order in March 2025)?” Justice Jain asked.
Ghose explained that the Court of Justice recommended Dehadrai to withdraw the application, indicating that the appeal before the High Court was the relevant legal means.
What will be on Henry’s binding?
The High Court in Delhi will again hear this case on December 22nd, when the MP Mahua Moitry MP Mahua Moitr will consider.
The Delhi High Court has not yet raised an order on the graft of the court of court, which means that both parties remain forbidden to make any public statements on the case.
Dehadrai’s petition was designed by advocate Gaurav Sarkar.
(Tagstotranslate) Battle Custody Battle (T) Delhi High Court (T) Mahua Moitra (T) Pet Rottweiler (T) Gag Order (T) Jai Anant Dehadrai (T) Lawyer (T) Pet Rottweiler Dog
