The court also wanted several clarification from Tamil over the Dr. Ambedkar Law University.
On Wednesday, the Madras High Court ordered the government advocate (crime) to evaluate the criminological and penal response of a student of legal law after doubting whether Tamil Nadu The University of Ambedkar accepts a transparent evaluation process.
The RN Mala has also ordered the university to clarify whether it provides key keys to the evaluators and the criteria received by the latter to award brands unless they have provided any such keys. He also called on data concerning the number of students who failed in the semester exams.
The judge also wanted to know the number of students who have asked for overestimation and repetition and the results of such revaluation in the last three years. She ordered the university to explain whether the revaluation was allowed even for those who wanted to improve their passage stamps.
The university was also ordered to explain whether copies of responses were made available to students when they apply for revaluation or should only be obtained through the 2005 Information Act.
Provisional instructions were issued on a written petition submitted by MEP Sunil Sunil from the seams in Perungudi, Chennai. The petitioner who claimed that he could not fail in a criminological and penological document, was looking for a direction to overestimate again and declare him that he had gone through it.
Judge Mala, who decided to explore his script of answers, asked the prosecutor Hasan Mohammed Jinnah to propose a legal official to evaluate the response script. SPP proposed the name of the government advocate (Criminal Party) C. Pratap.
“With regard to the proposal of the prosecutor, the prosecutor shall order this court Dr. C. Pratap, a government advocate (criminal party) to evaluate the petitioner’s answers and submit his report to this court on April 16, 2025,” the judge also ordered to answer the court issues.
Published – April 2 2025 9:12
