Lawyers fighting against the murder proceedings with Karen Read reported on Friday the final arguments after weeks of testimony in one of the most dividing cases at all. In this case, the concept of tired love has gone wrong against defending the claim that the cast of a fixed harmful law in Boston killed colleagues a police officer, ”says the AP report.
What is Karen Read Case about?
Karen Read, at the age of 45, is accused of killing her friend, 46 -year -old John O’Keefe, who is also an officer of the coercive body in Boston. Reportedly, she struck him with her SUV and let him die in the snow before the ongoing home party, where the other police officers in Boston, along with O’Keefe, drank in the neighborhood in Canton.
Reading was accused of killing and murdering the second grade and also for escape from the scene after hitting his friend. Meanwhile, Read’s lawyer defended the accusations and said she had become a scapegoat in a conspiracy, which even included false discontinuation of the evidence that involved it.
The first trial concerning these murder accusations took place 1 July last year, but ended in a suspended jury. “Several jurors came out after saying that the panel unanimously agreed that reading was not guilty for the most serious accusation of the second degree murder,” he reads.
“The state of the state was led by a special prosecutor Hanek Brennan, who called less witnesses than prosecutor Adam Lally, who made the first court against reading. Brennan referred to a statement of reading the possibility that she was filed to O’Keefe, which was based on police reports but from a voluntary interview.
Meanwhile, the second court Read began with a defense team who claimed to have been involved. “The advocates presented a different view of how the Read rear lights were cracked. They tried to show through witnesses, watching video and photos that could damage its rear lights in the morning after O’Keefe death when it retreated from his driveway with her own,” says AP.
(Tagstotranslate) lawyers
