The High Court in Kerala sought the clarity of the global Ayyapp Sangamam, which was planned on the banks of the Pampa 20th September.
The bench of Devan Ramacandran and the Justice Syam Kumar VM in the middle of the Travancore Devaswom (TDB) and other parties to specify the nature of the event. It is said that TDB did not mean Ayyapp itself. If the event is organized by TDB, why it is called Global AyyAppa Sangamam. Resources of devotees cannot be used to do so. Any TDB event must be spiritual and religious, the court said, warning the need for transparency.
Observation of the court came to the public interest (drank) Filed by Ajeesh Kalathil Gopius, a law that sought a direction that limited the state government and TDB in the event. He claimed that the event was “political” and therefore cannot be allowed in the name of Ayyapp.
Universal report
TDB advisor said the event is leading to the “demonstration of Sabarimals as a global pilgrimage center and spreading the universal message” Tohwamasi “to support religious harmony and global unity.” “Sponsorship,” he said, and regardless of the nature of sponsorship, they specifically mentioned the nature of sponsorship.
The leader of the famous court reported that the event was organized exclusively by TDB and that the government only offers support for crowd administration.
In addition, the court stated that no party inaccuracy informed her of the nature of the proposed event. When TDB said they were trying to show Sabarimal as a global pilgrimage center, it can only be interpreted that they promote the pilgrimage as part of their duties and duties under the Hindu Institutions of the Travancore Cochin of 1950.
About sponsorship
Given that the government clearly happens that the event organizes only TDB, with the government provides only services for safety/crowd management, the entire responsibility for it does not follow the second (TDB). The proposed event on the banks of the Pampa River can only be allowed with the highest sacredness, because Pampa is often referred to as “Dakshina Ganga”. TDB must explain and record all German information about the event and its schedule. The question of financing is essential because “sponsorship”, as TDB said, should only be from verifiable and trustworthy sources, the court added.
Subsequently, respondents were issued a notification and the case was sent to heard 9 September.
Read more
Published – 3 September 2025 20:49
