T. Harish Rao | Photo Credit: MoHD Arif
Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) Supremo and former Chief Minister K. ChandrSekhara Rao and former Minister T. Harish Rao, who were charged with Judge PC Ghos Commission in his report on the alleged inconsistencies in the Kaleshwara They export illegal commissions and summarize the illegal commission and collect the illegal commission and summarize the illegal commission and summarize the illegal commission.
Both written petitions, administered separately by KCR and Mr. Harish Rao, were on the control scene with the HC register and yet were numbered. The programs of two petitioners are likely to mention on Wednesday’s action in HC for hearing.
They stated that GO MS No. 6 Department of irrigation and Development of Command, which appoints justice (retirement) PC Ghos as an inquiry commission to carry out a court investigation of alleged discrepancies in the implementation of the Kaleshwaam project was the “Ultra Vires” provision of the 1952 investigation Act.
They wanted the message presented by the Commission of July 31, in which it allegedly made “prejudice, appalling, slanderous and frightening observations and findings” to be canceled and canceled. The report without providing them with notifications pursuant to sections 8-B and the 8-C Act on the Communications Act, Mala-Fide and distorted, and therefore the report should be canceled, they said.
The main secretary and irrigation and secretary CAD, who repeatedly published copies of the report without giving them a copy, was also illegal and against the principles of natural justice, they said. The Kaleshwaam project was “conceived, designed and executed by the Telangana government in strict adherence to all relevant procedures and standards,” KCR said.
The then government by decision of the cabinet involved m/s advisory services (India) to recommend an alternative place for Tummidihatti for the construction of fire. After the WAPCOS report, the Center provided all legal permits for the Kaleshwaam project, he said.
The petitioners stated that the conditions of the Commission’s legacy assumed negligence, discrepancies and gaps in the planning, design and construction of Medigadda, Annaram and removed Barrages. KCR said that despite writing a letter to the main secretary, the latter did not provide a copy of the Commission report yet.
Observation of the Commission showed that it incorrectly stipulated responsibility, KCR said in a lawsuit. The Commission could not independently assess the facts and reflected only propaganda initiated by the current government, he said.
Published – August 19, 2025 9:08
