New Delhi: In a new reversal in the ongoing dispute over the will of late Sunjay Kapur, who was chairman of Sona Comstar, his children with his ex -wife Karisma Kapoor on Thursday said Dilli High Court (HC) on Thursday £The 30,000-crore property was “apparently counterfeit will” and claimed that it was created in a criminal conspiracy involving his widow Priya Sachdev kapur and more.
Kapur died on June 12 in the UK after accumulating during the pole match from a sudden heart attack, allegedly launched as he swallowed the bee.
The head of the lawyer Malesh Jethmalani, representing the Karisms of Kapoor, presented the accusation of Judge Jyoti Singh and claimed that Sunjay Kapur did not have a role in the preparation or treatment of will. The Word Microsoft document was reportedly changed on March 17, 2025, while Sunjay was on holiday.
Also read | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Karisma Kapor vs Priya Kapur: Inside the dispute over the estate of Sunjay Kapur
Jethmalani said that the file does not contain any Sunjay digital track, but shows activity from other individuals allegedly involved, including Priya Kapur. He added that no lawyer was consulted and the author was not informed.
Jethmalani, which describes the situation as a “extended conspiracy”, warned that it could represent a crime under Section 467 of the Indian Criminal Code, which sets a life imprisonment for the creation of will.
The head of the lawyer questioned suspicious circumstances surrounding the will. “It is a natural course of behavior for a man who is so educated, perfect that when he performs will, he will certainly ask the bailiff who will collect assets and distribute them according to tenor will,” will I have your permission? “But nothing like that was done.
Jethmalani also asked why Priya Kapura demanded that she would share a copy of the will (NDA). “If Priya Kapur was certain about the truth of will, then why did NDA want? Look at her behavior. The most sophisticated, Sunjay kapur, had nothing to do with his own will.”
The lawyer also described Priya Kapur as manipulative and compared it to the “bad stepmother”.
“She is the stepmother of Cinderella,” he said, accusing Priya of negotiations to limit the inheritance of Karisma Kapoora’s children.
The Jethmalani also questioned the role of Suri Marwah, a bailiff, and claimed that “the person doing assets was not a bailiff, but Priya himself.” Two witnesses of will, said, later they got roles in companies associated with the estate, which is a “ominously comfortable” formula that exposed counterfeiting. None of the witnesses gave an affidavit verification of the will and contributed to doubts about its origin.
Also read | Court Papers, Sebi letters lie bare kapur siblings’ long struggle for Sona comstar
After opening a sealed cover that contained the original document and a list of assets, Singh noted that the list did not provide any signature and ordered Priya Kapur to complete the honorary statement.
The thing will now be heard on October 13.
In the previous hearing of Delhi HC allowed Priy Kapura to submit details of Sunjay Kapura assets in a sealed cover. After the court directive on 10 September, all parties were asked to publish the assets of the late chairman.
Dispute
The dispute revolves around Sunjay Kapur £30 000 crore property, attacked between their children-samaira and Kiaan-A of his widow Priya Kapur. Samira and Kiaan searched for one fifth of their father’s personal assets and claimed that they had not been given a copy of the will despite repeated requirements. The will is reportedly left to the whole estate Priya Kapur.
It is said that she appeared during a meeting in Delhi Taje Mansingh Hotel 30. July. The meeting attended by Priya Kapur, its legal advisor, Marwah and the executives of Aureus Investment PVT. LTD, promoter entity Sona Comstar. His official registration state remains unclear.
Also read | Sona Comstar did not inform who controls family confidence after Sunjay Kapur, says CEO
Original petition named Priya Kapur; her son with Sunjay, Azarius Kapur; Sunjay’s mother Rani Kapur and Marwah as defendants, along with Dinesh Agarwal and Nitin Sharma, director of the Aureus investment, claim that the agreement to transfer personal assets in favor of Priya Kapur.
Although the mother Sunjay Kapurová was named as the defendant in the original petition given by his children with Karisma Kapoor, during the hearing of 10. She has not yet failed a separate legal response in this matter.
(Tagstotranslate) Sunjay kapur
