The police team Delhi led by the representative of the police commissioner (Nový Delhi) on Wednesday visited the residence of the judge of the High Court in Delhi Yashwant Varma in connection with the investigation of the alleged discovery of cash, the PTI official source report said.
The alleged discovery of cash occurred after a fire in the residence of Varma Lutyens Dilli around 14th March around 23:35, which caused fire officers to rush to the place. The team allegedly checks the location where the fire has occurred and can question employees working in the judge’s residence.
SC rejects urgent hearing of action at the hearing
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court rejected the urgent mention on Wednesday that the action is looking for the direction of the police in Delhi to file a company in connection with the case.
The bench headed by the chief judge of Sanjiv Khanna was asked by lawyer Mathews Jdumpar to indicate that the action be stated on an urgent hearing in front of the bench because it concerned a greater public interest.
CJI, which stopped the practice of oral references about cases of urgent extracts, said the plaintiff would appear.
On Tuesday, the stay of justice Varma visited three members of the internal committee appointed by the Supreme Court because it initiated its investigation.
As a result of the controversy of Apex Court Collegium, the repatriation of the justice of Varma, which was issued by the High Court in Delhi after the Directive Cji, to his parents, Allahabad High Court.
On 22nd March CJI introduced a three -member committee, which carried out an internal investigation, and decided to record the chief judge of DK UPphyay of the High Court in Delhi in the incident. It included photos and videos of the alleged discovery of a huge cash hiding place.
What did the action said
Nedumpar and three more on Sunday filed a lawsuit and three others looking for the police to give fir on this matter.
The application also questioned the 1991 judgment in the matter of Veeraswami, in which the Supreme Court ruled that no criminal proceedings could be initiated against the judge of the High Court or the Supreme Court without the nod of the Indian judge.
The reaction of justice verma
In his response, which was given by the chief judge Delhi High Court DK UPAPHYAY, the judge Varma “unambiguously” rejected the accusation against him. He said that neither he nor his family members had put cash in the warehouse and that the proposal that “we kept or stored this cash was completely nonsensical”.
Allahabad HC lawyers in an indefinite strike
The Association of Bar Association Allahabad High Court Association launched an indefinite strike on Tuesday to protest against the proposed transfer to the Supreme Court in the bluelet Judge Delhi HC Yashwant Varma, faced with a probe after a huge amount of cash from his residence.
The Supreme Court’s Bar Bar Association independently called on the Center to return the recommendations of the Supreme Court for the transfer of the judge. She also demanded the indictment against him to “restrict further damage to the public faith in the judiciary.
The Association of the Association of the Association of the Allahabad High Court Association at the gate number 3 of the bench of the High Court in Allahabad, his President Anil Tiwari told reporters that their disturbance was not against any court or judge, but “against those who betrayed the judicial system”.
(Tagstotranslate) justice yashwant verma
