Members of the Bar Association will arrive at the Supreme Court to meet the CJI above the judge Yashwant Varma Row, in Nový Delhi, 27 March 2025 | Photo Credit: PTI
The main judge of India Sanjiv Khanna (27 March 2025) met the office wearers of the lawyer associations of various state courts who sent their request to select a petition to transfer the judge of the High Court, Judge Yashwant Varma, to the Allahabad High Court.
The delegation consisted of representatives of the Bar Associations of the Supreme Courts Allahabad, Gujarat, Keral, Jabalpur, Karnataka and Lucknow. They met with the main judge and other higher judges of the Collegia top court, including the Justices Br Gavai, Surya Kant, such as the eye and Vikram NATH at the Supreme Court. The delegation was not given any assurances to re -consider the proposal of the Supreme Court transfer.
In a joint statement, delegation of lawyers from all over five countries also insisted that “criminal law must be moved”, as well as any government employee to appear full truth for the fire incident and the alleged discovery of half the currency in the justice of Varma.
“According to a report by the Chief Judge of the High Court in Delhi, someone took articles from the premises of 15 March. If the criminal law was put into motion, the evidence would not be destroyed,” the delegation of lawyers from the Supreme Courts said in a joint statement.
The delegation expressed their recognition of the Supreme Court to publish a report on the investigation submitted by the High Court in Delli DK UPphyaya on the fire and alleged finding of half -burnt cash.
However, their joint statement insisted that the College must also order the proposed transfer of justice of the justice of the Varma to be relieved to be relieved. The judge was canceled from Judicial Labor 22nd March.
Importantly, the delegation urged judges of CJI and the higher court to set the standards of court liability and re -assess the current internal procedure to apply for serious accusations against the judges. The three -member committee is currently making a deeper probe into the case of the case of the judiciary.
The actual procedure was approved by the Supreme Court in 1999. It is based on the spirit of two important charters governing the judicial ethics-the work of the values of judicial life and the principles of Bangalore in 2002.
The “reworking of judicial life” is the primary Code of Ethics that the Supreme Court accepted the Supreme Court on May 7, 1997.
The first rule of the Code is that the judge’s behavior must “reaffirm the faith of people in the impartiality of the judiciary”. He emphasizes that “any act of the judge of the Supreme Court or the High Court, whether in official or personal capacity, which disrupts the credibility of this perception, must be avoided”.
Bangalore’s 2002 principles are a framework for the regulation of court hearing. It requires a judge to ensure that his actions, both in the court and outside the court, maintain and increase public confidence, legal professions and court disputes in the impartiality of the judge and judiciary.
Published – 27 March 2025 03:23 is
