Israel is considering a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities without the US support, according to the NBC report that quotes five individuals who are familiar with this matter. It seems that this has gained urgency because it seems that diplomatic interviews between the United States and Iran are aimed at a preliminary agreement that includes the provisions of uranium enrichment that Israel considers unacceptable.
Officials stated that the Israeli leadership considers the emerging framework to be a shortage to prevent Iran to become a nuclear state.
Israel: “The world must react definitely”
Israel has issued a strict warning to the international community over Iranian nuclear ambitions and described Tehran events by violating his global obligations.
The Israeli Foreign Ministry said in a statement published on X: “Iran consistently prevented the verification and monitoring of the IAEA, removed the inspectors and disinfected and hid the suspicious unnamed places in Iran.”
He added: “These actions undermine the global regime of non -heating and represent an immediate threat to regional and international security and stability.”
“The international community must definitely respond to non -compliance with Iran and take measures to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.”
Israeli urgency associated with the timeline
Israeli officials allegedly believe that if the agreement is completed, it could limit any future military opportunities and increase Iranian international legitimacy. This fear leads to an urgency behind a potential one -sided action.
Iran: “We target all US bases”
In response to this, Iran launched a military exercise “focusing on enemy movements” and issued more threats of retaliation if attacked by Israel or the US.
Iranian Minister of Defense Aziz Nasirzadeh warned: “All his (American) bases are on our reach, we have access to them and we target them in the host countries without hesitation.”
“God willing, things will not reach this point and the conversations will succeed,” he added, warning that “the US will suffer more losses” if the war breaks out.
General Commander of the Revolutionary Guard Hossein Salami was also alarm: “Iranian retaliation to any Israeli aggression will be stronger and more destructive than in previous offensive.”
Trump in Talks with Tehran expresses concern
US President Donald Trump, who is allegedly engaged in advanced discussions with Iran on a possible nuclear agreement, expressed growing frustration with Iranian bargaining attitude. He publicly warned that Iran “could not have a nuclear weapon”, he emphasizes that he is now “less self -confident” about the success of diplomacy.
Trump proposed a framework to reduce Iranian nuclear abilities, but acknowledged that Tehran has grown more hard lines, making the resolution uncertain.
Trump expresses doubts about diplomacy
At the Podcast of Force One, Trump admitted that he was “less confident” to achieve a new agreement with Iran. “They seem to be delayed and I think it’s a shame,” he said. “If the agreements do not commit, they will not have a nuclear weapon. If they agree, they will not have a nuclear weapon. This is not the case.”
Yet he added, “It would be nicer to do it without war … But we’ll see. Time will say.”
IAEA: Iran contrary to nuclear obligations
Like the Governor’s Council, the latest development is the International Council for the Agency for Atomic Energy (IAEA) sold a proposal for a resolution that found that Iran had not followed its international nuclear obligations-first in 20 years.
The Board of Directors, which includes the US as a member, has renewed the requirements for Iran to explain the traces of uranium found in non -reported nuclear places. The resolution urges Tehran to cooperate with long -term investigation “immediately”.
(Tagstotranslate) Israel is considering a unilateral strike on Iran
