On Wednesday, she accused her former co -owner of trying to blackmail him by claiming to be cheated on his minority share in the club on Wednesday accusing his former co -owner on Wednesday accusing his former co -owner, who tried to blackmail of his minority in the club.
Venta capitalist in London capitalist Manoj Badale and his company developing media companies are suing entrepreneurs Raj Kundra at the London Supreme Court for alleged violations of confidential settlement agreement in 2019.
The case focuses on the former Kundra shares in Rajasthan Royals, the winner of the 2008 inauguration IPL, which is now the richest cricket tournament with a brand of $ 12 billion.
Badale’s lawyer Adam Spector said Kundra, who is married to the star Bollywood Shilpa Shetty, had There was a risk of reporting serious accusations Indian authorities in “blackmailing the experiment”.
Kundra, however, says that he was informed about the plaintiffs and his lawyer William McCormick that if it wasn’t true, “at the right time it will be exposed”.
Kundra had to fail his 11.7% stake after being found guilty in 2015 for betting on the IPL games in a scandal that led to Rajasthan Royals suspended for two years, Spekeker said.
He added in the trial that Kundra sent Badale “from blue” last month and claimed that he was “listed and cheated on my 11.7% share”.
Badale said that Kundra filed a complaint with the Indian authorities and threatened to report to the Indian cricket council (BCCI).
Kundra, however, added that he was willing to discuss an agreement concerning “renewal of my original capital or compensation reflecting the actual and current award of the franchise of Rajasthan Royals”.
The speker said Kundra also sent the disgrace of the founder of IPL Lalit Modi and said that Badale “did not realize that he was cheating on my real value, he would cost him expensive”.
Badale and its emerging media businesses that hold a 65% stake in Rajasthan Royals, have acquired a provisional trial against Kundra on May 30, preventing Kundra from breaking the settlement agreement by doing so
Kundra’s lawyer McCormick said that Kundra had accepted that the court order should continue until complete court about the action.
“It is not admitting that nothing inappropriate or endangered is done,” McCormick said.
– ends
Published:
Akshay Ramesh
Published on:
June 25, 2025
