Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli (AFP Photos) When India prepared for her five test series against England, starting on June 20 in Leeds, former England Great Geoffrey Boycott strongly weighed in the absence of two Indian devotees – Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli – called Kohli’s retirement.In his column for the Daily Telegraph Boycott wrote: “Returning to Virt Kohli and Rohit Sharma hurts the chances of India, which beats England. Kohli is the biggest loss because he was their best Batsman and Talisman in all three formats.”Go beyond the border with our YouTube channel. Subscribe!In the recognition of Rohit’s posts Boycott said that the former captain “will not miss as much as Kohli”, which in the last few years quoted Rohit’s inconsistent test form. “Rohit has never been a natural athlete like Kohli … wear of the opening of shifts and the captain in all three formats worn it down,” he added.
Vote
Who do you think will be missing more in the Indian line -up against England?
Both players left the test cricket in May and left significant emptiness in the India line -up – especially in the highest ranking and on No. 4.Boycott turned his attention to the host and had for Ben Stokes And Co. Word carefully, fresh from test victory over Zimbabwe. He warned that England had to alleviate its aggressive “bastard” if they were to dominate the Indian Team of the Transient Phase.
Dhruv Jurel’s production: son of war hero Kargil, who chose cricket over the army
“England should defeat India if they alleviate bastards and use some common sense,” Boycott wrote. “It is not possible for us to tell us how well you are when you did not make a single WTC final at home. They should be embarrassed.”He called England “One-Trik-Pars,” he urged the boycott: “Being the winner is better than being known as entertainer … Bring your best game and apply some cricket Nous.”
