Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq said on Tuesday that India has rejected third -party mediation on bilateral issues. In an interview with Al Jazeera, Doha on the outskirts of the Arab-Islamic emergency summit, a gift, which is also the Deputy Prime Minister, remembered the time when US Secretary of State Marco Rubio met.
The gift remembered that when he met Rubius in July and asked the dialogue with India, the best American diplomat explained that India claimed to be a “bilateral problem”.
“When I met Rubius 25 July in Washington, I asked him what happened to the dialogue? He (Rubio) said India said it was a bilateral problem,” the gift recalled.
Asked about negotiations with India or Pakistani openness to third -party involvement, the gift answered: “We do not mind, but India categorically states that this is a bilateral matter …”
“Pakistan is looking for friendly ties, but … ‘
The gift also stressed that Islamabad is looking for friendly relations with all neighbors, including Delhi.
According to Geo News TV, Dar reaffirmed that Pakistan was looking for friendly ties with all his neighbors, including India, but warned that sovereignty would never be at risk.
The gift repeated that Pakistan has always supported the peacekeeping solution of conflicts through dialogue and believed that the actions were the best way forward – provided that from all sides there was sincerity and seriousness.
The tension between India and Pakistan rose after the terrorists killed 26 people, mostly civilians, in Pahalgam Jammu and Kashmir 22 April.
India started the Sindoor 7th Operation on May and focused on the terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan, occupied Kashmir in retaliation for an attack of Pahalgam.
India and Pakistan achieved an understanding of 10 May until the end of the conflict after four days of intensive cross -border blows of drones and missiles.
US President Donald Trump repeatedly claimed that he had mediated a ceasefire between two armed nuclear weapons.
India claims that he does not want to engage in his discussions with Pakistan about questions like terrorism, that he must remain bilateral.
In his interview, the gift stressed that Pakistan decided to remove terrorism from his land and in this struggle he made the highest victims.
“It is surprising that the country most affected by terrorism is still accused of India,” the press agency quoted it.
“Future Wars would fight for water”
Regarding water problems, the gift warned that the future wars would fight for water and recalled that, according to Indian waters agreement, India could not unilaterally suspend or abolish water distribution.
“Pakistan explained that any attempt to stop water would be considered a statement about the war,” he warned.
The day after the terrorist attack in Pahalgam India, India has taken a number of repressive measures against Pakistan, which included the introduction of Indus Waters from 1960 to “Abeyance”.
To Pakistan’s nuclear ability
Asked about the nuclear abilities of Pakistan, the gift said that the country’s nuclear power is purely defensive, has never been used and is not intending to use it; However, if Pakistani sovereignty is attacked, it will defend itself at all costs, regardless of which country is involved.
The gift also said that Kashmir is an internationally recognized dispute with the UN resolution.
About the Israeli strike on Qatar
Express Tribune said the gift also described the recent Israeli strike on Qatar as a serious event against international law, the UN Charter and the sovereignty of Muslim countries.
“You saw that Lebanon, Syria, Iran and Qatar attacked. This approach is unacceptable,” he said, adding that Qatar was involved in us and Egyptian peace interviews at the time of the strike, and that the attack was intended to do this.
Referring to the meeting of the 57 -member organization of Islamic cooperation, that there is no time for resolutions and statements; A clear action plan is needed to indicate what measures will be taken unless Israel stops its aggression.
The gift said that Pakistan’s priority was always peace, dialogue and diplomacy. However, if the dialogue fails and does not stop aggression, effective measures will be necessary, “which could include economic sanctions, legal steps or the creation of regional security forces”.
(Tagstotranslate) Pakistan
