Ben Stokes and Ravindra Jadeja (AFP photo) Former Indian cricket Parthiv Patel consisted of the controversy of Handshake, which broke out during the fourth test between India and England, which raised an interesting question: “If Ben Duckett detonated 90 in the same situation and offered the opposition to Handshake, would England accept it?”The drama developed at the final moments of 5. Day after India mounted a strong struggle to maintain a series alive, thanks to a durable, undefeated 203-run stand between Ravindra Jadeja (107*) and Washington Sundar (101*).
Ben Stokes Press Conference: About Handshake, India Fightback, its own fitness
The English captain Ben Stokes with the draw has appeared inevitable inevitable to offer a handshake and signal the end of the game. But with Jadeja at 89 and Sundar at 80, but the couple refused and preferred to chase his individual milestones as they were approaching for centuries. In the last few overs, England resorted to the bowling company and even handed the ball to Harry Brook’s partial timer, which brought what looked like half-heart in the hope that the dough was in a hurry and ended the wrestling, in which England once organized a commanding 311-run.The exchange took place on live television and Stokes saw a mockery from Jadeja and questioned whether he would finish his century against Brook, who is not even considered a part -time pitch.
Vote
Has India made the right decision by continuing the bat for centuries?
The English opener Zak Crawley also rang and joked that Jadeja should burn faster if he wanted to reach a milestone. In the last hour, the leader reflected exhaustion, frustration and the helplessness of the English camp, especially after he wasted the golden opportunity to cook the series. Stokes himself looked visibly pain and clutched the shoulder after every birth.“England was doing things in their own way. Their efforts were clear – they wanted to go and win the game,” Parthiv said during his performance at Jiohotstar.“But when they realized that it was not possible, they laid their weapons and acknowledged that India was playing very well,” he added.He continued to determine India and the determined display of their dough.“At the same time, India did what they wanted to do in their own way – two players worked really hard, burned brilliantly, and they both deserved a score of centuries,” he said, referring to Jadeja and Sundar’s bold effort.Parthiv then represented hypothetics to question the narrative surrounding the “spirit of the game”.“The only question I have: If Ben Duckett detonated to 90 in the same situation and offered the opposition to Handshake, would England accept it? I am very curious that he knew it, especially with so many talks about the” spirit of the game, “he said.The former Wicketkeeper also claimed that India had all the rights to continue and that the match still had a meaningful cricket.“In my opinion, the game should continue until the end of the day, although Indian doughs have completed their centuries. If there were still 15 breaks, India should detonate because it worked extremely hard,” Parthiv stressed.He pointed out how quickly the momentum moved, and remembered the dangerous situation the day before.“Before lunch 4th day, when two goals were scored, India seemed to lose a 5th day. But from that moment to the launch of 143, there was an incredible effort,” he stressed.Finally, Pardiv supported India’s challenge to continue sharing personal opinion.“So I believe that what India did was absolutely right – although I personally feel they could burn a little more,” he said.The series remains alive at 1-2, while the fifth and last test is scheduled for oval 31 July.
